The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Football
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Thu Apr 02, 2009, 04:38pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Indianola, Ia
Posts: 319
Punt Returner Protection to Catch/Field

Team B punting to Team A

B14 punts the ball but it is low and short.

Ball land about 8 short of A22 who is running forward to field the punt.

Ball hits the ground 5 yards shot of A22 and takes two low hopes then bounces high and hits A22 in the chest where he muffs the ball.

B44 recovers the ball.

B44 the gunner on the kicking has run downfield and closing in on A22 as the ball reaches A22 -

1) hits A22 before the ball hits A22 in a blocking techniques style- result of play?

2) hits A22 after the ball hits A22 in a blocking techinique- result of play?

3) hits A22 before the ball hits A22 in a tackle (arms wrapped) - result of play?

4) hits A22 after the ball hits A22 in a tackle (arms wrapped)- result of play?

make sure state if fed or ncaa or is there is a difference between the two please
__________________
"Call what you see and see what you call!"
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Thu Apr 02, 2009, 07:22pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 14,616
Once the ball hits the ground, there can't be kick catching interference. It's no longer possible for him to "catch" the ball. It's perfectly legal to hit him.

BTW, your post is kind of difficult to understand. One thing that may help you in the future is that we use R for receiving team and K as kicking team. R22 instead of A22 for example.
__________________
"...as cool as the other side of the pillow." - Stuart Scott

"You should never be proud of doing the right thing." - Dean Smith
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Thu Apr 02, 2009, 10:16pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Indianola, Ia
Posts: 319
yes i was in a hurry and out touch with the football jargon right now, anyway sure most of you understand, my apologies
__________________
"Call what you see and see what you call!"
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Fri Apr 03, 2009, 04:09am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Germany
Posts: 204
No problem about the wording. Better to have a pooly worded question than not have the question asked. We can still ask for clarification.

As BktBallRef pointed out Kick Catching Interference is out.

It is possible (probable from the image in my mind) to have a foul on
#3 of Illegal Use of Hands (for holding)

but all the rest should be ok.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Fri Apr 03, 2009, 08:15am
Ref Ump Welsch
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by jjrye22 View Post
No problem about the wording. Better to have a pooly worded question than not have the question asked. We can still ask for clarification.

As BktBallRef pointed out Kick Catching Interference is out.

It is possible (probable from the image in my mind) to have a foul on
#3 of Illegal Use of Hands (for holding)

but all the rest should be ok.
I would think #3 would be Holding because the ball is live for R to attempt a play and R22 is eligible to touch the ball and make some kind of play with it. I'm thinking of the parallel to tackling an option quarterback after he's clearly made the pitchout to the halfback and the quarterback is still eligible to touch the ball on the play. Or am I stretching the rule a bit here?
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Fri Apr 03, 2009, 09:06am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 118
I agree no KCI. NF Case Book 9.2.3 C is a similar play although it covers a pass behind the line and not a kick. However, the contact is the same as in the plays presented.

A1 is passing to A2 who is behind the line. Before the pass reaches A2, (a) B1 tackles A2 or (b) B1 blocks A2. Ruling (a) Tackling A2 is a form of holding. Defensive players are prohibited from grasping an opponent other than the runner. (b) the contact is not PI and, if the block itself is legal, there is no infraction. (7-5-10)
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Fri Apr 03, 2009, 11:24am
Ref Ump Welsch
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim D. View Post
I agree no KCI. NF Case Book 9.2.3 C is a similar play although it covers a pass behind the line and not a kick. However, the contact is the same as in the plays presented.

A1 is passing to A2 who is behind the line. Before the pass reaches A2, (a) B1 tackles A2 or (b) B1 blocks A2. Ruling (a) Tackling A2 is a form of holding. Defensive players are prohibited from grasping an opponent other than the runner. (b) the contact is not PI and, if the block itself is legal, there is no infraction. (7-5-10)
So applying the principle from that case play, #3 from the OP could be holding because R22 has yet to touch the ball, no?
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Fri Apr 03, 2009, 12:19pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,876
Quote:
Originally Posted by BoBo View Post
Team B punting to Team A
Aha, trick question! Must be Canadian rules because by now the return kick is illegal in all USA codes.

Quote:
B44 the gunner on the kicking has run downfield and closing in on A22 as the ball reaches A22 -

1) hits A22 before the ball hits A22 in a blocking techniques style- result of play?

2) hits A22 after the ball hits A22 in a blocking techinique- result of play?

3) hits A22 before the ball hits A22 in a tackle (arms wrapped) - result of play?

4) hits A22 after the ball hits A22 in a tackle (arms wrapped)- result of play?
Offside intereference in 1 & 3.

Quote:
make sure state if fed or ncaa
Uh-oh...I didn't think we were in Kansas any more.

Sorry, couldn't resist.

Robert in the Bronx
(Is either NCAA or Fed still in Shawnee Mission or KCK?)

Last edited by Robert Goodman; Fri Apr 03, 2009 at 12:33pm.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Fri Apr 03, 2009, 12:27pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 118
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ref Ump Welsch View Post
So applying the principle from that case play, #3 from the OP could be holding because R22 has yet to touch the ball, no?

Correct, 9-2-3-c A defensive player may not use his hands or arms to hook, lock, clamp, grasp, encircle or hold in an attempt to hold an opponent other than the runner.

Since the player in #3 is not a runner, he can't be held. Penalty - Illegal use of hands or arms.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Fri Apr 03, 2009, 12:33pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 3
BTW, your post is kind of difficult to understand. One thing that may help you in the future is that we use R for receiving team and K as kicking team. R22 instead of A22 for example.
_____________________________
Diesel Watches | Swiss Watches

Last edited by indi456; Sun Oct 11, 2009 at 08:14am.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Tue Apr 07, 2009, 02:21pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Alabama
Posts: 226
I agree with the foul summary provided by Jim D. While KCI is out, we could still have first touching by K.
__________________
Experience is something you don't get until just after you need it.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Eye Protection outathm Softball 18 Wed Jun 04, 2008 05:40am
Fair Catch & Punt Return TNStripes Football 16 Fri Oct 12, 2007 11:16am
NFHS Rule Question on Fair Catch Protection refdawg Football 7 Thu Aug 18, 2005 06:33am
Free-kick for a field goal after a fair catch tpaul Football 20 Fri Aug 06, 2004 03:21pm
Punt Catch Rule slippery rock Football 0 Sun Nov 02, 2003 05:37pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:54am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1