The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Football
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Mon Nov 10, 2008, 01:42pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 39
Send a message via Yahoo to Tom Hinrichs
Illegal Numbering

I do not have my rule book handy- please help me with a rule reference.

#51 lines up in the backfield as a blocking back. Team A runs a play-action pass and throws to a swing pass (forward pass behind the L.O.S.) to #51 who advances 10 yards before being tackled.

I have a live ball foul for illegal touching- five yard penalty from the previous spot and loss-of-down. What is the rule reference please?
__________________
"Where are we going and why are we in this hand cart?"
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Mon Nov 10, 2008, 01:55pm
Fav theme: Roundball Rock
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Near Dog River (sorta)
Posts: 8,558
Lightbulb Canadian Ruling

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Hinrichs View Post
#51 lines up in the backfield as a blocking back. Team A runs a play-action pass and throws to a swing pass (forward pass behind the L.O.S.) to #51 who advances 10 yards before being tackled.
CANADIAN RULING:

Ineligible receiver downfield. 10 yards from PLS, repeat the down.

To avoid the foul, # 51 would have had to report as eligible.
__________________
Pope Francis
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Mon Nov 10, 2008, 02:13pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 225
5 yards and LOD is correct.

If the spot of the foul was behind the LOS, then that should've been your enforcement spot.

7-5-13
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Mon Nov 10, 2008, 02:29pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Plymouth, MN
Posts: 741
Send a message via Yahoo to MNBlue
Quote:
Originally Posted by JugglingReferee View Post
CANADIAN RULING:

Ineligible receiver downfield. 10 yards from PLS, repeat the down.

To avoid the foul, # 51 would have had to report as eligible.
I don't know anything about Canadian FB, but is that right? Ineligible downfield on a pass that didn't go beyond the LOS and the ineligible wasn't beyond the LOS either?

Seems odd.
__________________
Mark

NFHS, NCAA, NAFA
"If the rule you followed brought you to this, of what use was the rule?" Anton Chigurh - "No Country for Old Men"
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
numbering FATUMP Football 8 Tue Nov 14, 2006 01:25pm
Illegal numbering OverAndBack Football 7 Tue Sep 05, 2006 10:04pm
numbering ref13 Football 9 Wed Oct 12, 2005 12:44pm
Illegal Numbering Simbio Football 9 Wed Aug 25, 2004 10:03pm
numbering Issue sm_bbcoach Football 5 Tue Dec 02, 2003 07:18pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:41pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1