The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Football

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Sun Nov 02, 2008, 01:17pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,305
Illegal Motion or False Start

Ignore the announcer on this play The foul was actually called against the "stationary" RB who obviously missed the snap count and false started. Let's assume he had done nothing and all we had was the action ofthe motion back. Are you letting this go until the snap and then flagging as illegal motion or are you shutting it down and handling as a false start since he also apparently missed the snap count?

http://www.youtube.com/v/Zrc5gDc3-LM
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Sun Nov 02, 2008, 01:54pm
MJT MJT is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Alton, Iowa
Posts: 1,796
That was a lean, and not a step (as there was in the Texas - TTech game) so I'd have illegal motion on this play. The T -TTech play was called the way we have been instructed, as the RB took a step. No arguement by the coaches in last nights game.

TXMike, I would assume you saw the play I am talking about in last nights game. Did you agree with that one?
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Sun Nov 02, 2008, 01:56pm
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,463
If the player had done something to make it look like they were to go in motion, then I would see this not being called as a FS. But that is not what he did. He clearly missed the snap and that should be called. In this case this is college and you do not want to have defense moving into the neutral zone as a result of an offensive player missing the snap.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Sun Nov 02, 2008, 01:57pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,875
I can't view the video, but the spirit of the false start rule is to mitigate some of the advantage team A has of knowing the snap count, by giving assurance to team B that if certain movements are made by A, they're either illegal or a reliable sign that the ball is in play. So did the 2nd player's movement look as if it would lead the opponents to believe the ball was being put in play? If not, I'd let it go and give team A a chance to complete their (unplanned) shift, or to call time out, or to snap the ball and give team B the opp'ty to accept or decline an illegal motion call.

If you're saying the player "obviously missed the snap count" (my emphasis), then you're saying his action was so closely associated with his usual action at the snap as to lead the other team to believe the ball was snapped, therefore false start. But if that's not so obvious, then illegal motion if the ball's snapped during the shift or less than a second after everyone resets. If a player of B encroaches in apparent rxn, then you can use that as evidence of a false start and negate the encroachment call; but that's not an open-and-shut case, because it's common for team A to start one back moving, then shift another back, to maintain the deception of the usual MIM, and will sometimes draw an opponent offside in a way that's ruled legal. The rulebook phrases "quick, jerky movement" vs. "smooth and rhytmic" helps a little, but this is one of the most judgement-and-custom-infused area of the rules, and I'm sure some officials will be more favorable to team A and others to team B, because the rulesmakers have in effect said you're allowed to fool the defense a certain amount but no more. Of course being more generous to team A concerning what's a false start can wind up being more generous to team B by producing a live ball foul instead, depending on how team A reacts to their own miscue, but I don't think the officials should anticipate that.

Robert
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Sun Nov 02, 2008, 02:26pm
MJT MJT is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Alton, Iowa
Posts: 1,796
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRutledge View Post
If the player had done something to make it look like they were to go in motion, then I would see this not being called as a FS. But that is not what he did. He clearly missed the snap and that should be called. In this case this is college and you do not want to have defense moving into the neutral zone as a result of an offensive player missing the snap.

Peace

Rut,
I disagree cuz I don't think he missed the snap count, as he did not start to move (lean) until the receiver had been in motion for over 2 seconds. Now if he started his lean the very instant the receiver went in motion, the "missed the snap" would have more bearing and I could see a FS being the correct call. Watch it again keeping in mind what I am saying and see what you think.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Sun Nov 02, 2008, 03:45pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 58
Quote:
Originally Posted by MJT View Post
so I'd have illegal motion on this play.
Illegal shift
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Sun Nov 02, 2008, 04:02pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 7,620
Quote:
Originally Posted by DesertZebra View Post
Illegal shift
Could have had IM too (instead), as the motion man was moving forward at the snap.
__________________
Cheers,
mb
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Sun Nov 02, 2008, 04:09pm
MJT MJT is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Alton, Iowa
Posts: 1,796
Quote:
Originally Posted by DesertZebra View Post
Illegal shift
This would not be an illegal shift because of the definition of a shift. See case play 7.2.7 for a similar explanation of the difference between IM and IS, similar to this play.

Last edited by MJT; Sun Nov 02, 2008 at 04:12pm.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Sun Nov 02, 2008, 04:23pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,305
What I was trying to assess was the legality of what the motion man was doing assuming the RB who had lurched forward had done nothing. Make believe that RB had not moved at all and all we had was what the motion man was doing....false start or illegal motion?
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Sun Nov 02, 2008, 04:35pm
MJT MJT is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Alton, Iowa
Posts: 1,796
Quote:
Originally Posted by TXMike View Post
What I was trying to assess was the legality of what the motion man was doing assuming the RB who had lurched forward had done nothing. Make believe that RB had not moved at all and all we had was what the motion man was doing....false start or illegal motion?
Well if that is what you are discussing, that is a classic example of IM cuz he is moving towards the LOS at the snap. It would not be a FS in this case. It would be a FS if he was going sideways, or slightly backwards and then turned quickly up field before the snap cuz that quick turn would be simulating the start of the play.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Sun Nov 02, 2008, 08:26pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 45
Live ball foul, since it's not a foul until the snap. If he'd adjusted his motion to a path that was parallel to the LOS before the snap, we'd have nothing (That is, ignoring the obvious false start by the RB).
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Sun Nov 02, 2008, 09:51pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 58
Quote:
Originally Posted by MJT View Post
This would not be an illegal shift because of the definition of a shift. See case play 7.2.7 for a similar explanation of the difference between IM and IS, similar to this play.
Not the same thing. This was not a QB in motion.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Sun Nov 02, 2008, 10:05pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 90
Quote:
Originally Posted by TXMike View Post
Ignore the announcer on this play The foul was actually called against the "stationary" RB who obviously missed the snap count and false started. Let's assume he had done nothing and all we had was the action ofthe motion back. Are you letting this go until the snap and then flagging as illegal motion or are you shutting it down and handling as a false start since he also apparently missed the snap count?
Unlike #7's move, #17's move was not clearly illegal until the snap. As ljdave said, he could have adjusted his motion so that he was no longer moving towards the line of scrimmage.

Illegal motion.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Sun Nov 02, 2008, 11:52pm
MJT MJT is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Alton, Iowa
Posts: 1,796
Quote:
Originally Posted by DesertZebra View Post
Not the same thing. This was not a QB in motion.
True, but the fact is it does not meet the definition of a shift, so it cannot be an illegal shift.

SECTION 39 SHIFT
A shift is the action of one or more offensive players who, after a huddle or after taking set positions, move to a new set position before the ensuing snap.

The back does not move to a new set position, he just leans, so it cannot be an IS. It is pretty much semantics to say IS or IM anyway cuz they are treated exactly the same way, but they are different rules.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
False start or motion? CO ump Football 9 Mon Oct 15, 2007 10:32pm
Illegal Motion vs False Start BoBo Football 27 Sun Sep 23, 2007 12:57pm
False Start or Illegal Motion Mountainman Football 14 Tue Nov 09, 2004 07:10pm
False Start or Illegal Motion??? The Ref of OZ!!! Football 12 Mon Oct 06, 2003 02:18pm
False start or illegal motion? dhoney Football 1 Tue Nov 20, 2001 11:03am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:12am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1