The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Football
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #16 (permalink)  
Old Mon Sep 29, 2008, 03:43pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Great Britain
Posts: 244
Changed in 2007, I just checked in my Fed book and "legal" is highlighted. 2-32-11 is also listed right at the front of the book in the rule changes section.

At the back of the book (page 90) in the "Comments on 2007 changes", it says

adding the word legal to the definition of a passer will clarify the rule


The rule committee might have been thinking primarily about illegal passes from beyond the line and not wanting RTP on those instances?
.
__________________
Sorry Death, you lose.... It was Professor Plum!
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old Mon Sep 29, 2008, 03:54pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Glendale, AZ
Posts: 1,023
That may have been part of the genesis of it. If a would-be passer is past the line, the defense has a right to consider him a runner, with whom you have a bit more latitude. If said runner suddenly becomes a passer after he's crossed the line and throws a ball and you nail him, it doesn't seem fair that he could say he was a passer.

That said, if they'd meant it to be only for illegal passes beyond the line (which is only one of the many illegal passes), they could have specified that.
__________________
"And I'm not just some fan, I've refereed football and basketball in addition to all the baseball I've umpired. I've never made a call that horrible in my life in any sport."---Greatest. Official. Ever.
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old Wed Oct 01, 2008, 09:26am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Battle Creek, MI
Posts: 383
[QUOTE=Deep;540014]
Fourth, you might want to ask the B about having 2 USC penalties on the same guy on the same play. It's possible, but it's rare.


QUOTE]

THe situation was that at the end of the play B77 was taunting A15 for the first USC and after the BJ threw the flag B77 said to the BJ "Your going to call that bullsh!t."
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old Wed Oct 01, 2008, 10:15am
Rich's Avatar
Get away from me, Steve.
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 15,783
Quote:
Originally Posted by With_Two_Flakes View Post
Changed in 2007, I just checked in my Fed book and "legal" is highlighted. 2-32-11 is also listed right at the front of the book in the rule changes section.

At the back of the book (page 90) in the "Comments on 2007 changes", it says

adding the word legal to the definition of a passer will clarify the rule


The rule committee might have been thinking primarily about illegal passes from beyond the line and not wanting RTP on those instances?
.
Regardless, it says what it says. IG is usually thrown with imminent pressure and it's unlikely we're going to have RTP in a normal IG situation anyway. But once ruled IG, we either have a PF or we have nothing.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Did I mess this one up? JS 20 Basketball 79 Wed Jan 16, 2008 07:37pm
Oh Boy! we have a mess! Ron Pilo Basketball 33 Mon Dec 10, 2007 04:24pm
What a Mess! umpire99 Baseball 14 Mon Mar 26, 2007 08:40am
How about this mess! Buckeye12 Baseball 13 Thu Apr 10, 2003 12:56pm
What a mess! Buckeye12 Baseball 14 Mon Jan 27, 2003 10:02am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:26pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1