View Single Post
  #17 (permalink)  
Old Mon Sep 29, 2008, 03:54pm
OverAndBack OverAndBack is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Glendale, AZ
Posts: 1,023
That may have been part of the genesis of it. If a would-be passer is past the line, the defense has a right to consider him a runner, with whom you have a bit more latitude. If said runner suddenly becomes a passer after he's crossed the line and throws a ball and you nail him, it doesn't seem fair that he could say he was a passer.

That said, if they'd meant it to be only for illegal passes beyond the line (which is only one of the many illegal passes), they could have specified that.
__________________
"And I'm not just some fan, I've refereed football and basketball in addition to all the baseball I've umpired. I've never made a call that horrible in my life in any sport."---Greatest. Official. Ever.
Reply With Quote