![]() |
|
|||
substitution vs. participation, a condensed version
Due to the length and ridiculousness of the other thread, I thought it would be wise to start another thread summarizing the rules and case plays that come into play in these types of sitatuations. This if for federation rules and is based federation mechanics.
First, you must look at the definitions of what is participation and substitution.
Next, you have to address the issue of counting. Ideally you should have your count done early in the dead ball period. The earlier your count is done, the more you can focus on the other stuff you are responsible at that time. Counting responsibilities vary depending on your area and the number of people on your crew. In our area, HL, LJ, and B all count B in 5 man, and HL and LJ, counting B in four. A is counted by R and U in both 4 and 5 man. Let's take a look at what is a substitution is and the rules related to it. for brevity, I am not going to copy and paste all of 3-7, but basically any number of players can be replaced and once they are notified that they are replaced, they should leave the field immediately (normally immediately is viewed as within 3-5 seconds). Substitution can only be done during the dead ball period and shall be done in a manner not intended to deceive the opponent. Now there are numerous other factors to consider when deciding to call illegal substition or illegal participation. These factors are outlined in the case book. They are:
So to sum this up, if 12 players participate during the down, regardless of when the official completes his count, it is a live ball foul for illegal participation. If an official counts 12 players on the field during a dead ball period and sees no one making an effort to leave the field, kill the play and it is a dead ball foul for illegal substitution. If the 12th is making an effort to leave the field, it is a live ball foul for illegal substitution. In many areas, there are prevailing philosophies that say that a player has "left the field" if they are behind the official or outside the numbers and thus they pass on calling anything. That's up to your officials or state association. If in question, shut the play down prior to allowing the ball becoming live and get an accurate count. I think the following case book play is a perfect example related to the other thread: 3.7.1 SITUATION B: A number of team substitutes enter the field between downs. The officials do not recognize that one replaced player does not leave the field immed iately. When the ball is snapped: (a) B12 is attempting to get off the field, or (b) A12 is in the formation as an extra lineman. RULING: In (a), it is an illegal substitution foul and in (b) it is illegal participation. COMMENT: In a related situation, if the covering official’s count of players has determined there are more than 11 prior to the snap, a dead-ball illegal substitution foul should be charged since a replaced player(s) did not leave immediately. However, if the official’s count is not completed before the snap is imminent or if the substitution has not been monitored, it becomes illegal participation at the snap if more than 11 are in the formation. Each team is responsible for substituting legally and for replaced players to leave immediately as required. (3-7-4; 9-6-4c) I'm sure there are avenues I overlooked. Thoughts?
__________________
Check out my football officials resource page at http://resources.refstripes.com If you have a file you would like me to add, email me and I will get it posted. |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
substitution vs participation | hawkishowl20 | Football | 186 | Sun Sep 21, 2008 11:55am |
illegal Substitution or illegal Participation | verticalStripes | Football | 11 | Fri Sep 12, 2008 10:57am |
Coaches's Version Of LBR | whiskers_ump | Softball | 3 | Tue May 03, 2005 12:06am |
Illegal Substitution vs Participation | mcrowder | Football | 7 | Fri Sep 17, 2004 12:39pm |
enzona.net English version! | enzona | Basketball | 1 | Tue Jan 15, 2002 01:55pm |