The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Football
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Tue Sep 16, 2008, 10:52am
Fav theme: Roundball Rock
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Near Dog River (sorta)
Posts: 8,558
Quote:
Originally Posted by wwcfoa43
Canadian Ruling, con'd

I am not sure it is accurate to say that RTP passer cannot be flagged once B intercepts the ball. There is no rules verbiage to that effect. I believe QBs should get the same protection whether the ball is dead or intercepted.

However, you are correct that the rules for applying UR mean that if the ball is intercepted then B will keep it.

It is interesting that a roughing the kicker does have an exception to the normal UR application rules and even though most RTK occurs after the ball is in flight we still consider the foul as if it occured prior to the ball being in flight.
Good catch. Editted to include the OB event.

Given that B went OB, then the passer was hit, I do not have RTP.
__________________
Pope Francis
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Tue Sep 16, 2008, 10:56am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 183
Canadian Ruling

Quote:
Originally Posted by JugglingReferee
Good catch. Editted to include the OB event.

Given that B went OB, then the passer was hit, I do not have RTP.
Canadian ruling, con'd

I still respectfully disagree. If the QB happens to throw an incompletion and get hits in what would be considered RTP, it is still RTP even though the ball is dead.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Tue Sep 16, 2008, 11:40am
Fav theme: Roundball Rock
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Near Dog River (sorta)
Posts: 8,558
Quote:
Originally Posted by wwcfoa43
Canadian ruling, con'd

I still respectfully disagree. If the QB happens to throw an incompletion and get hits in what would be considered RTP, it is still RTP even though the ball is dead.
This could be a play that you have to see.

You might call RTP. I am near certain that I wouldn't call RTP; there's too much time and too many events after the release, imho, for RTP. Rather, I have a generic UR.
__________________
Pope Francis
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Tue Sep 16, 2008, 11:46am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 622
2-32-11...A passer is a player who throws a legal forward pass. He continues
to be a passer until the legal forward pass ends or until he moves to participate in the play.

Since he didn't move to participate, he's a passer until the pass ends. Sounds like a PF, not RTP.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Tue Sep 16, 2008, 01:02pm
Rich's Avatar
Get away from me, Steve.
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 15,794
Quote:
Originally Posted by kdf5
2-32-11...A passer is a player who throws a legal forward pass. He continues
to be a passer until the legal forward pass ends or until he moves to participate in the play.

Since he didn't move to participate, he's a passer until the pass ends. Sounds like a PF, not RTP.
Bingo. The bolded phrase is what I was waiting for. And that's what I called. Personal foul, half-the-distance on B, enforced from the end of the return, B possession.

The title of the thread was mainly a diversion.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Tue Sep 16, 2008, 03:56pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 183
Quote:
Originally Posted by JugglingReferee
This could be a play that you have to see.

You might call RTP. I am near certain that I wouldn't call RTP; there's too much time and too many events after the release, imho, for RTP. Rather, I have a generic UR.
My point was that if the events satisfied the criteria for RTP, the fact that the ball was intercepted or dead (or both) would not change that.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Tue Sep 16, 2008, 05:59pm
Fav theme: Roundball Rock
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Near Dog River (sorta)
Posts: 8,558
Quote:
Originally Posted by wwcfoa43
My point was that if the events satisfied the criteria for RTP, the fact that the ball was intercepted or dead (or both) would not change that.
I see. I was commenting on this particular situation as posted by the OP. I read your comments as considerations for RTP.

What would you call on this play? Or do you have to see the play?
__________________
Pope Francis
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Tue Sep 16, 2008, 06:08pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 101
I would agree with Rich's reply for a PF, since he is not a passer any longer. Late hit, PF.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Wed Sep 17, 2008, 07:17am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 51
Now this will really get guys wound up...where is the enforcement point (and remember the heated discussion about spots)?
__________________
"My purpose on life was to not make people happy, it is to make the correct call!!"
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Enforcement of 1-5-3k alabamabluezebra Football 2 Sat Sep 03, 2005 11:43pm
Enforcement? jimmiececil Football 4 Tue Aug 23, 2005 11:41am
Is this a PSK Enforcement? jrfath Football 5 Fri Sep 03, 2004 05:31pm
PSK Enforcement Bubba10Dara Football 8 Wed Oct 01, 2003 03:26pm
Need help with enforcement........ ump76 Football 3 Wed Aug 27, 2003 12:28pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:30pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1