The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Football
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #106 (permalink)  
Old Thu Sep 18, 2008, 05:18pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 7
Surely 'Inadvertant Whistle' would be inaccurate as well. I'm no expert, but wouldn't ruling it an IW give the offence the opportunity to replay the down? Which would have been even worse for the Chargers.

How I see it, as a complete amateur, is that it was ruled a forward pass. That means the ball was dead once it hit the ground, and nothing past that point could matter. In fact, the ball was fumbled, so from the time when the ball left the QB's hand to the point where it hit the ground, it was a fumble. When it hit the ground, it was a fumbled ball that was then dead (technically due to the inital ruling, not due to the whistle, but the problem with revising the replay rules is, in fact, the whistle and players' reaction to it: see the Philadelphia-Dallas game). The team in possession of the ball immediately before it became dead was Denver, so they gain/retain possession of the ball at the point where it became dead, namely the 10 yard line, and the down counts. This is different from any kind of IW ruling, I would have thought.
Reply With Quote
  #107 (permalink)  
Old Thu Sep 18, 2008, 05:27pm
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,527
Quote:
Originally Posted by pedr View Post
Surely 'Inadvertant Whistle' would be inaccurate as well. I'm no expert, but wouldn't ruling it an IW give the offence the opportunity to replay the down? Which would have been even worse for the Chargers.

How I see it, as a complete amateur, is that it was ruled a forward pass. That means the ball was dead once it hit the ground, and nothing past that point could matter. In fact, the ball was fumbled, so from the time when the ball left the QB's hand to the point where it hit the ground, it was a fumble. When it hit the ground, it was a fumbled ball that was then dead (technically due to the inital ruling, not due to the whistle, but the problem with revising the replay rules is, in fact, the whistle and players' reaction to it: see the Philadelphia-Dallas game). The team in possession of the ball immediately before it became dead was Denver, so they gain/retain possession of the ball at the point where it became dead, namely the 10 yard line, and the down counts. This is different from any kind of IW ruling, I would have thought.
The NFL is a different code. You cannot compare NFL rules to other levels.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
  #108 (permalink)  
Old Thu Sep 18, 2008, 06:25pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 7
As I said, complete amateur. I'm not even American - just interested.

What is the NFL rule on IW, then?

In any event, it strikes me as a factually incorrect term to use for what happened (and Mike Pereira didn't use it on Official Review, as far as I remember). The whistle was not inadvertant - the whistle followed and reflected the Referee's decision. The implications of that decision were a dead ball, last possessed by Denver, which logically leads to Denver retaining possession.
Reply With Quote
  #109 (permalink)  
Old Thu Sep 18, 2008, 06:33pm
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,527
Quote:
Originally Posted by pedr View Post
As I said, complete amateur. I'm not even American - just interested.

What is the NFL rule on IW, then?
I do not know, but I know that with well over 200 differences from the NCAA level to the NFL Level (and about the same number when you compare NF and NCAA). I am going to assume that the application with replay has a different twist to that rule or where the ball it put after the IW.

Quote:
Originally Posted by pedr View Post
In any event, it strikes me as a factually incorrect term to use for what happened (and Mike Pereira didn't use it on Official Review, as far as I remember). The whistle was not inadvertant - the whistle followed and reflected the Referee's decision. The implications of that decision were a dead ball, last possessed by Denver, which logically leads to Denver retaining possession.
If you kill a play when it was not supposed to be killed, that is an inadvertant whistle. That would be no different when you call a player down when they clearly do not have the ball. This was the same thing. The only difference was the NFL has replay and that is how they noticed the situation.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
  #110 (permalink)  
Old Thu Sep 18, 2008, 07:01pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 105
JR - Pedr is correct accoriding to Pereira. Go to Dan Patrick's web page and listen to the 3rd hour.
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/dan...treamingaudio/

According to him "No" IW. Even though I agree "It looked like a duck and quacked like a duck, it must have been a duck."
Reply With Quote
  #111 (permalink)  
Old Thu Sep 18, 2008, 07:43pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 7
That's a great radio show!

It's fascinating to hear them try to figure out how it all works. It's clearly complicated - perhaps it'll help people to see just how convoluted the football rules are! - yet they seem to be getting close to understanding that once the play is ruled dead, the ball belongs to the team which previously had it, where the ball was when the play ended.
Reply With Quote
  #112 (permalink)  
Old Thu Sep 18, 2008, 09:37pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 460
Quote:
Originally Posted by 3SPORT View Post
JR - Pedr is correct accoriding to Pereira. Go to Dan Patrick's web page and listen to the 3rd hour.
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/dan...treamingaudio/

According to him "No" IW. Even though I agree "It looked like a duck and quacked like a duck, it must have been a duck."
Thanks for the link. Great interview to clear up some things.

Quote:
Originally Posted by JRutledge View Post
I do not know who your friend is and honestly it is irrelevant. According to what Pereira said on several media outlets, it must have meant something. And if it did not mean anything, why put the ball back where the play was killed? Either you are misunderstanding your friend or Pereira is purposely deceiving the public.
Did you listen to the interview? My NFL official friend was correct and is not irrelevant.

Pereria said the "ruling of an incomplete pass killed the play, not the whistle." The whistle has not bearing on the ruling of the play and does not mean anything. The ball is put back where the was killed because that is the procedure when the called dead due to an incorrect ruling.
Reply With Quote
  #113 (permalink)  
Old Thu Sep 18, 2008, 09:56pm
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,527
Quote:
Originally Posted by dahoopref View Post
Did you listen to the interview? My NFL official friend was correct and is not irrelevant.

Pereria said the "ruling of an incomplete pass killed the play, not the whistle." The whistle has not bearing on the ruling of the play and does not mean anything. The ball is put back where the was killed because that is the procedure when the called dead due to an incorrect ruling.
I actually did not listen to the interview, I hear Pereria talk about this issue about 10 times this week already. I did not need to hear another interview with the same thing. Also, I actually know one of the officials that were on the game. I will ask him instead of a lot of "he said, he said" anecdotes about the game. I will ask him if I get a chance about to ask him as well as others. I am sure he will talk about it without me asking him about it in a couple of weeks. He is going to speak at a function for our association then. He tends to talk about situation that take place good or bad that he has experienced while in the NFL. That is why I do not care what your friend says with all due respect.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
  #114 (permalink)  
Old Thu Sep 18, 2008, 10:35pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 460
That would be great to hear. Keep us updated when you get the chance. Thanks.
Reply With Quote
  #115 (permalink)  
Old Fri Sep 19, 2008, 12:51am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 747
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRutledge View Post
I actually did not listen to the interview, I hear Pereria talk about this issue about 10 times this week already. I did not need to hear another interview with the same thing. Also, I actually know one of the officials that were on the game. I will ask him instead of a lot of "he said, he said" anecdotes about the game. I will ask him if I get a chance about to ask him as well as others. I am sure he will talk about it without me asking him about it in a couple of weeks. He is going to speak at a function for our association then. He tends to talk about situation that take place good or bad that he has experienced while in the NFL. That is why I do not care what your friend says with all due respect.

Peace

Too bad you did not listen to the interview.
It answered all the questions.
Reply With Quote
  #116 (permalink)  
Old Fri Sep 19, 2008, 01:07am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: N.D.
Posts: 1,829
Quote:
Originally Posted by rulesmaven View Post
In the micro sense, it's too bad that a missed call probably contributed directly to the outcome of the game. .
It didn't lead DIRECTLY to the outcome of the game. San Diego still needed to give up a TD and a 2-pt conversion and they couldn't defend either.
Reply With Quote
  #117 (permalink)  
Old Fri Sep 19, 2008, 03:05am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 36
Quote:
Originally Posted by Forksref View Post
It didn't lead DIRECTLY to the outcome of the game. San Diego still needed to give up a TD and a 2-pt conversion and they couldn't defend either.
I love how you keep blaming San Diego Defense like they just laid down and let denver score.

No timeouts to recoup from the emotional swing and scheme a defense to stop them. Keep in mind the defense thought they had made a play and had subsequently won the game

Visiting team, its always harder to make plays on the road

I agree our middle linebackers sucks, Steven Cooper will be back in two weeks and he will make a big difference
Reply With Quote
  #118 (permalink)  
Old Fri Sep 19, 2008, 07:07am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: N.D.
Posts: 1,829
Quote:
Originally Posted by fljet View Post
I love how you keep blaming San Diego Defense like they just laid down and let denver score.

No timeouts to recoup from the emotional swing and scheme a defense to stop them. Keep in mind the defense thought they had made a play and had subsequently won the game

Visiting team, its always harder to make plays on the road

I agree our middle linebackers sucks, Steven Cooper will be back in two weeks and he will make a big difference
Sounds like we should have grief counselors available so those guys don't break down and cry after some adversity. Hey, they're getting paid millions of dollars to make plays and in crunch time they didn't. And maybe we should have all games played at neutral sites since they're not up to the task of playing on the road.

No, they didn't lay down on the last 2 plays. It just looks like they did. Let's just say with the game on the line that they choked! Oh, and we'll forget about the other 31 points that they gave up. They didn't lay down and let Denver score.

And the defense didn't make a play. Cutler just lost the ball without being touched. Picking up a ball isn't making a play. They didn't make a play then nor did they make one on the next two plays or on the winning drive. As a matter of fact, when did they make a play in the 60 minute game? How can you expect to win when you give up 39 points??

I need a break, I'm getting very emotional about this situation. Where is my grief counselor?
Reply With Quote
  #119 (permalink)  
Old Fri Sep 19, 2008, 07:42am
Adam's Avatar
Keeper of the HAMMER
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MST
Posts: 27,190
Quote:
Originally Posted by Forksref View Post
I need a break, I'm getting very emotional about this situation. Where is my grief counselor?
Busy with Washington fans.
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
fan boys, get over it, howler monkeys, supie chargers


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New to San Diego James Neil Baseball 26 Sun Mar 11, 2007 09:32pm
Question for San Diego Steve gotblue? Baseball 2 Sat Jan 13, 2007 02:41am
Kansas City/San Diego game alabamabluezebra Football 10 Thu Dec 29, 2005 02:35am
Denver stripes Basketball 23 Thu Apr 25, 2002 11:32pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:34pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1