Quote:
Originally Posted by 3SPORT
JR - Pedr is correct accoriding to Pereira. Go to Dan Patrick's web page and listen to the 3rd hour.
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/dan...treamingaudio/
According to him "No" IW. Even though I agree "It looked like a duck and quacked like a duck, it must have been a duck." |
Thanks for the link. Great interview to clear up some things.
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRutledge
I do not know who your friend is and honestly it is irrelevant. According to what Pereira said on several media outlets, it must have meant something. And if it did not mean anything, why put the ball back where the play was killed? Either you are misunderstanding your friend or Pereira is purposely deceiving the public.
|
Did you listen to the interview? My NFL official friend was correct and is not irrelevant.
Pereria said the "ruling of an incomplete pass killed the play, not the whistle." The whistle has not bearing on the ruling of the play and does not mean anything. The ball is put back where the was killed because that is the procedure when the called dead due to an incorrect ruling.