|
Wed Jun 18, 2008, 08:01am
|
|||
|
|||
|
I interpret the rule literally to mean the ineligible A player can be in the ENZ whether he is engaged in blocking or not, but he cannot go beyond the ENZ before the pass is thrown.
Bob M. broke this down sentence by sentence, and I see the third being merely a subset of the first. The second being an exception to the first. Why add the third sentence at all, as it adds nothing to the first.
__________________
Rick 
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| NFHS Rule Changes | rainmaker | Basketball | 3 | Tue May 02, 2006 12:08am |
| NFHS Rule 8-3-9 or 8-4-2 | l3will | Football | 4 | Wed Oct 12, 2005 08:45pm |
| NEW - 2003 NFHS Football Rule Changes (as written by the NFHS Rules Committee) | KWH | Football | 27 | Tue Jan 21, 2003 11:30am |
| New NFHS 3-second rule? | Self | Basketball | 15 | Wed Aug 28, 2002 02:47pm |
| NFHS RULE, NEW | whiskers_ump | Softball | 3 | Wed Aug 08, 2001 08:50pm |
Threaded Mode
