|
Wed Aug 08, 2001, 06:29pm
|
|||
|
|||
New NFHS rule 8-3-4....
Clarifies that when a runner passes a base, she is consider to have touched it for the purpose of an appeal. If runner is consider to have touched the base, guess appealing for missing that base is plum outda question huh??? [  ]Just seeing if anyone sleeping?? glen
__________________
glen _______________________________ "Twenty years from now you will be more disappointed by the things that you didn't do than by the ones you did do. So throw off the bowlines. Sail away from the safe harbor. Catch the trade winds in your sails. Explore. Dream. Discover." --Mark Twain. 
|
|
Wed Aug 08, 2001, 08:42pm
|
|||
|
|||
|
Glen,
Not quite. The runner is assumed to have touched the base for purposes of force outs and/or any happening or infraction which requires that this particular runner safely advance at least one base. On appeal, this runner can be called out for the missed base (not for the force).
__________________
Steve M
|
|
Wed Aug 08, 2001, 08:50pm
|
|||
|
|||
Dakota, Steve,
 I was just funning, but thanks for replies. At least you not sleeping. Guess Joel was, he did not reply. [grin] glen
__________________
glen _______________________________ "Twenty years from now you will be more disappointed by the things that you didn't do than by the ones you did do. So throw off the bowlines. Sail away from the safe harbor. Catch the trade winds in your sails. Explore. Dream. Discover." --Mark Twain.
|
 |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Linear Mode
