The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Football
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Tue Oct 09, 2007, 12:28am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 39
Rut I agree this TO before the snap is cheap, but only allowing players to call a TO has a small loophole.

2-32-15 ...a sub becomes a player when he enters the field and communicates with a teammate OR AN OFFICIAL...

All the coach has to do is tell B12 to step on to the field and call a TO right in front of the wingman. Of course this might not work inside the 25yd, but you get my point. And of course the LB can still call a TO to the Ump.

I just dont know how you could word this rule change?
__________________
All of my post are for NFHS rules
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Tue Oct 09, 2007, 12:38am
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,607
And you know all of that would and could delay the possibility for a timeout. At the very least it would require more of an effort to call a timeout instead of just standing near the ear of the official and calling a timeout.

I would not be surprised if at least mechanically the philosophy might change.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Tue Oct 09, 2007, 08:07am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 8,033
I hesitate to agree with Jim ...

But the only reason we've seen this 3 times recently is that it worked the first time. The next two, the kicker made the kick twice.

And this nonsense will continue until the kicker misses the FIRST one, and gets a 2nd chance - making the 2nd one. We only need to wait for that day, and the fad will go away.
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'”

West Houston Mike
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Tue Oct 09, 2007, 10:14am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 30
I don't have my book... NFHS ..I thought the wing or any other official had to make eye contact with the coach before calling the TO. If I'm on a wing and watching the LOS , I am not going to look away . This is especially important when inside the 25.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Tue Oct 09, 2007, 12:59pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 747
Quote:
Originally Posted by mbcrowder
I hesitate to agree with Jim ...

But the only reason we've seen this 3 times recently is that it worked the first time. The next two, the kicker made the kick twice.

And this nonsense will continue until the kicker misses the FIRST one, and gets a 2nd chance - making the 2nd one. We only need to wait for that day, and the fad will go away.
I want to be at the post game news conference with the losing coach when that happens.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Tue Oct 09, 2007, 03:01pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 508
I would change it that when K lines up in scrimmage kick formation, that R can not call time out within the last 5 seconds of the play clock. Thus, if K waits to the last 5 seconds before the kick, they can be assured no timeout. Thus R can still ice the kicker, but not right before the kick.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Wed Oct 10, 2007, 11:49am
Ref Ump Welsch
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I agree the rule needs to change. I had a sit last Friday where O had a running play, and the clock was winding down. I heard someone yelling timeout from the sideline, and looked over to see IF it was the HEAD coach. I see him signalling and yelling timeout, at the same time, I've got an assistant coach running a beeline at me yelling "He's calling timeout, he's calling timeout!" I blow my whistle and signal the timeout and then the assistant coach said "Jeez! 9 seconds lost off the clock!"

What did you just say? I walked up to the assistant and said loudly enough for EVERYONE on the sideline to hear "I was looking to make sure your HEAD coach was saying it. You don't need to run up to me and scream in my face. Next time you even do that may be the last time you do it on the sideline tonight!" He shook his head and turned away from me. I had to have a word with the head coach and told him to get his coaching staff under control. He had this look like, wow, you don't take much s**t, do you???

At halftime, my crew was asking me what happened, so I told the same story I just told you all. We decided to have the R, U, and myself (HL) talk with the head coach and reiterate the rule and ask him to tone his assistant down. Had no problems in the second half with any of the coaches on that sideline.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Wed Oct 10, 2007, 11:58am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 8,033
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ref Ump Welsch
I agree the rule needs to change. I had a sit last Friday where O had a running play, and the clock was winding down. I heard someone yelling timeout from the sideline, and looked over to see IF it was the HEAD coach. I see him signalling and yelling timeout, at the same time, I've got an assistant coach running a beeline at me yelling "He's calling timeout, he's calling timeout!" I blow my whistle and signal the timeout and then the assistant coach said "Jeez! 9 seconds lost off the clock!"

What did you just say? I walked up to the assistant and said loudly enough for EVERYONE on the sideline to hear "I was looking to make sure your HEAD coach was saying it. You don't need to run up to me and scream in my face. Next time you even do that may be the last time you do it on the sideline tonight!" He shook his head and turned away from me. I had to have a word with the head coach and told him to get his coaching staff under control. He had this look like, wow, you don't take much s**t, do you???

At halftime, my crew was asking me what happened, so I told the same story I just told you all. We decided to have the R, U, and myself (HL) talk with the head coach and reiterate the rule and ask him to tone his assistant down. Had no problems in the second half with any of the coaches on that sideline.
Just curious why you had this conversation with the assistant coach at all. If any warnings need to be delivered to any assistants - they need to be given to them by the head coach, and you need to be giving the warnings regarding assistants to the head coach. I never engage an irate assistant. I'll talk briefly to polite ones or those that just have questions or information. But irate ones don't get any direct responses.
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'”

West Houston Mike
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Those Damn SCABS thinking ONLY of themselves 3appleshigh Baseball 16 Fri Jun 16, 2006 05:49pm
new rule change I'd like to see cowbyfan1 Football 7 Wed Aug 10, 2005 06:56am
Another old rule change Rick Durkee Basketball 3 Tue Jun 07, 2005 08:12pm
8-2-2 Rule Change BktBallRef Football 10 Fri Jan 23, 2004 11:59pm
Damn Summer leagues moose69 Basketball 9 Thu May 10, 2001 04:24pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:28am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1