The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Football
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Mon Oct 01, 2007, 11:40am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,918
Quote:
Originally Posted by MJT
So, Bob are you going to just wind the clock when you know they didn't have any TO's left but you granted them one and leave it at that? Why doesn't the NF have a rule against calling a TO when you don't have one like in BB. It seems like it would be a good rule change because in the heat of the battle, an officials error by granting a TO they don't have should not give them a timing advantage.
At one time ISTR either NCAA or NFL (maybe both) having such a rule, but I actually prefer leaving it on the officials to not grant the request. If they put one over on the officials intentionally or accidentally and get granted a stoppage, I think all you should do is correct that error ASAP without a penalty. Players, substitutes, and partisans of various kinds may distract officials during a game with claims of various sorts, and you don't penalize those, do you? The only exception I know of is feigning injury.

Would you want to penalize a request for a measurement based on your guess that the captain requesting it didn't really believe it was necessary?

Robert
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Mon Oct 01, 2007, 11:49am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Clinton Township, NJ
Posts: 2,065
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert Goodman
...Would you want to penalize a request for a measurement based on your guess that the captain requesting it didn't really believe it was necessary?
REPLY: My only concern during potential measurement situations is whether I believe it's necessary. If a captain requests one and I don't feel it's necessary, he doesn't get it. I wouldn't 'penalize' his request; I just wouldn't grant it. That way, I don't need to consider any possible ulterior motives in his asking for it.
__________________
Bob M.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Tue Oct 02, 2007, 10:28am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 162
The only time you let a team call a timeout when they have not left, is when the coach wants an interperation. So you must know what the request is for.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Tue Oct 02, 2007, 12:22pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 321
1 - you can't penalize a team because the officials made a mistake. The rule covers this - look it up in the casebook, maybe it's covered there (granting TO when none are available).

2 - The rule says nothing about breaking the huddle with 12. It states that it is a violation for a replaced player to not leave immediately (NF, about 3-5 seconds).

Tell your WH that if he wants to make up his own rules, he should go create his own league.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
R1 stays at first ... two scenarios bobbrix Softball 8 Mon May 15, 2006 01:51pm
Two scenarios jking_94577 Basketball 8 Sat Mar 12, 2005 07:51am
more FT Scenarios? Troward Basketball 3 Tue Nov 05, 2002 07:18pm
Two scenarios Danvrapp Basketball 41 Tue Aug 07, 2001 08:53pm
Answer to "Two scenarios" Danvrapp Basketball 1 Fri Aug 03, 2001 08:13am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:13am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1