Int. grounding from shotgun snap

[Rich]

Originally Posted by Wesels

According to the rules: IT IS A FOUL IF THE QB IS UNDER DURESS AND THROWS THE BALL AWAY TO AVOID LOSS OF YARDAGE OR TO CONSERVE TIME!!!!

Under pressure and throwing at the RB's feet IS THROWING THE BALL AWAY TO AVOID LOSS OF YARDAGE!!!! AGAIN if you don't throw the flag for this cal YOU CAN NOT throw the flag for being in a shotgun formation and doing the same thing!!!!

CONSISTANCY!!!!!!!!!!!! OBVIOUSLY A FEW OF YOU DON'T HAVE IT!!!!!!!!!!

Excuse me while I cry cause you yelled at me. Boo hoo. Oh, I can do whatever I like, too.

And the word is consistency. With an "e."

[Wesels]

Originally Posted by RichMSN

Excuse me while I cry cause you yelled at me. Boo hoo. Oh, I can do whatever I like, too.

And the word is consistency. With an "e."

I'm glad you are not in our organization. Its people like you that give the good officials a bad name. Why don't you do us all a favor and QUIT!!! You "can do whatever you like" So you think you are above the rules. Well in my eyes you're nothing more than pond scum and you would never officiate a varsity game in our organization.

[Rich]

Originally Posted by Wesels

I'm glad you are not in our organization. Its people like you that give the good officials a bad name. Why don't you do us all a favor and QUIT!!! You "can do whatever you like" So you think you are above the rules. Well in my eyes you're nothing more than pond scum and you would never officiate a varsity game in our organization.

Boo hoo hoo. I'm really hurt, now.

If you guys allow a spike from the shotgun, it's your organization that has problems. Notice that nobody else here advocates a spike from the shotgun being legal. I guess everyone else should quit, too. And perhaps you should post more than 4 times before calling people names. Just a thought that I'm sure you'll ignore, troll.

[MD Longhorn]

A shotgun spike is not a legal spike.

[Wesels]

Originally Posted by RichMSN

Boo hoo hoo. I'm really hurt, now.

If you guys allow a spike from the shotgun, it's your organization that has problems. Notice that nobody else here advocates a spike from the shotgun being legal. I guess everyone else should quit, too. And perhaps you should post more than 4 times before calling people names. Just a thought that I'm sure you'll ignore, troll.

I see why you have over 4000 postings!!! Its because you suck and don't get any varsity games. I see that no one is advocating the shot gun spike but everyone is allowing the the ball thrown at the RB's feet to save loss of yardage. Its the same point that you, stupid moron that you are, are failing to realize. So you keep posting and keep doing the sub varsity games while those of us that know the rules and know how to officiate and keep control of the game keep going to officiate the state finals on a regular basis.

[MD Longhorn]

Originally Posted by Wesels

I see why you have over 4000 postings!!! Its because you suck and don't get any varsity games. I see that no one is advocating the shot gun spike but everyone is allowing the the ball thrown at the RB's feet to save loss of yardage. Its the same point that you, stupid moron that you are, are failing to realize. So you keep posting and keep doing the sub varsity games while those of us that know the rules and know how to officiate and keep control of the game keep going to officiate the state finals on a regular basis.

Thank you for your response to Rich. I was looking for a reason to expand my ignore list.

[FeetBallRef]

Gentlemen, what happened to our professional ethics & couresty towards our fellow officials. Just because one of us says something out-of-place, that doesn't give the rest of us any reason what so ever to act or respond in a like or worse manner. That stuff just doesn't belong on an official's professional forum...

[Wesels]

Originally Posted by mbcrowder

Thank you for your response to Rich. I was looking for a reason to expand my ignore list.

Cute I see you defend your boyfreind really well...lmao

[Welpe]

Wesels, I feel sorry for the crew you're on if your conduct on this forum is a reflection of your game management skills.

[Rich]

Originally Posted by Wesels

I see why you have over 4000 postings!!! Its because you suck and don't get any varsity games. I see that no one is advocating the shot gun spike but everyone is allowing the the ball thrown at the RB's feet to save loss of yardage. Its the same point that you, stupid moron that you are, are failing to realize. So you keep posting and keep doing the sub varsity games while those of us that know the rules and know how to officiate and keep control of the game keep going to officiate the state finals on a regular basis.

I am a varsity crew chief. I work every week, sometime 2-3 games a week depending on availability. I formed my crew in 2003 after moving here and the same core 3 officials have been on the crew since then.

Around here we all work subvarsity games, too. How am I supposed to improve my crew or bring new officials into the sport or on my crew unless I'm there to provide some direction, mentoring, and support?

Oh: You are a troll who has just found my ignore list.

[Niner]

I reviewed a game film and saw this intentional grounding call:

The QB was under duress, the WR goes down and in (probably should have been down and out from looks of defense), the QB throws to the down and out. Nobody in the area. There was nothing obvious about this play.

When do you consider missed route?
When do you consider the ability of the passer?
I hear "obvious" thrown around alot, but I wish everything was obvious to me.

[MD Longhorn]

Originally Posted by Niner

I reviewed a game film and saw this intentional grounding call:

The QB was under duress, the WR goes down and in (probably should have been down and out from looks of defense), the QB throws to the down and out. Nobody in the area. There was nothing obvious about this play.

When do you consider missed route?
When do you consider the ability of the passer?
I hear "obvious" thrown around alot, but I wish everything was obvious to me.

You always consider BOTH. Your real judgement here is - was the QB trying to throw the ball to someone, or was he simply trying to not get sacked. And if the latter, THEN you consider whether he managed to get the ball close enough to his receiver to not have a foul. If the former, then you don't have IG, even if the receiver ran the wrong route.

No, it's not always obvious, but with the QB under duress, you've got to err on the side of calling it.