|
|||
A case for encroachment as a live ball foul.
I had a situation occur tonight at a JV game that I handeled a certain way. I want the input if the hive mind here to help me sort it out. Down and distance are of little consequence.
I have a long run by A for a TD. Prior to signaling TD (I was the referee) I look for flags. LB has a flag. Apparently he has encroachment on B but neglected to blow the play dead. Now I have three options. First, I bring the ball back and asses the penalty...by the book. Second, I could wave the flag off. Or third (which I did) follow NCAA rules and give A the option of accepting the penalty or declining it and taking the TD. In retrospect I should have used the second option...but for some reason the first really didn't seem like an appropriate course of action. |
|
|||
I don't think you should have done what you did. You cannot waive it off either. You have no other choice than to tell the offensive coach that the official screwed up and the play never happened. When B encroached, the play never started. It was the officials error that allowed players to procede, but that doesn't change the fact that the play really was dead before it started.
I have done the same thing when an official in a lower level told me after the play he had a FS on the offense, but forgot to blow it dead. The coaches are not real happy about it, but they go on like they do with an IW. |
|
|||
Call it "tough love" or whatever, but having you're rookies own up to their mistakes rather than covering for them will be the best in the long run. If the play comes back and the new guy has to go with you when you explain to the coach what happened, he'll never make that mistake again.
|
|
|||
I should also add that I'd relatively new to this (5years). I'm trying to develop as a referee and continually find that every game I have the pleasure of wearing the white hat provides new opportunities to learn.
When I first started I found myself calling everything. I knew the book backwards and forwards and was what y'all would dub a book official. I was then enlighetened by the practice of being more a game manager instead of rules enforcer. I'm sort of working through that right now. That was my logic in doing what I did. My descision had to be made fairly quickly. My rational was that unlike an IW, the play was NOT stopped. None of the player realized the play was not supposed to be occuring. So in my mind, from a fairness-advantage gained standing, this was not like an IW. I felt that I had at my discression an opportunity to rectify an officials mistake. Since no advantage was gained by the foul and the actions in the play. I understand I lost an opportunity to show the LJ a "tough love" and teach him a lesson and I probably gave the coaches fodder to say the next time this happens "well the referee we had last week did this...". In retrospect I'm not trying to justify my actions. I'm trying to tweek my sense of how to be a great game manager while not completely trampling the guiding rules of the NFHS. |
|
|||
My first HS varsity game
In my first varsity game, I failed to blow a play dead where the tight end didn't place his mouth piece in his mouth at the snap and that play went 85yds for a touchdown. We brought that play back and I'm sure I won't make that mistake ever again.
|
|
|||
I agree with the others. You have to follow your rules code. However, as the title suggests, this is a good reason for FED to adopt the NCAA rule in this case. This rule has a lot of potential for abuse. If the defense sees that a wideout is uncovered (by the defense) they can simply jump offsides and take the penalty -- who wouldn't take 5 yards over a TD? This can be coached.
|
|
|||
Quote:
(BTW, so-called "cynical" offsides in rugby to kill a team's momentum has been a similar problem in that it's hard to penalize equitably.) During the 1960s (for I don't know how long) Fed had the same rule as now, except that if the ball was snapped too quickly for the whistle to be blown, play was to be allowed to continue. So you essentially allowed advantage or no advantage depending how quick you were with the whistle! One reason I believe was cited for adopting kill-the-ball was to avoid situations in which a player's entering the NZ blocked an opponent's view of the ball, and then the opponent went offside too. It seemed wrong to allow a futile play to proceed, and also to have the fouls offset, when the second player's encroachment on the NZ was caused by the opponent's going offside first. Killing the ball on the first encroachment also avoided the judgement of "spontaneous reaction charge", and it relieved team A from putting the ball into play quickly just to draw the penalty. So I can't say Fed has the wrong idea, even though intuition says to allow the nonoffending team a choice. Robert |
|
|||
Nah, it won't be fun, but it has to come back. Then the next possible moment, have a discussion with your crew and get some things clear. All part of the learning curve. Stuff does happen.
__________________
Be like a duck: cool and calm on the surface but paddling like the devil underneath.... |
|
|||
IMHO, in HS it's a safety issue as players are not that skilled to play though encroachment. The offense lines in the NFL and college are far better. At the HS level I could see more PFs and injuries. I would love it to be live ball, for a free play for the offense.
__________________
Knowing the rules is half of what it takes to be a good official. Being in position to make the call is the other half. |
|
|||
You can always waive off a flag. I guess the issue is how far off sides as the player. That might determine a lot of what we should do. If the official did not shut the play down properly, it is kind of hard to come back and be so technical with the rule when the official was not technical with their mechanics. I do not think there is a right or wrong answer to this question other than I would not use the NCAA application of the NF rule.
Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble." ----------------------------------------------------------- Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010) |
Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Live Ball Treated as Dead Ball Foul | GPC2 | Football | 9 | Tue Aug 21, 2007 11:04am |
live ball contact- technical foul? | refnjoe | Basketball | 8 | Wed Dec 06, 2006 09:53pm |
Thrown Elbow - Live Ball vs. Dead Ball | rfp | Basketball | 19 | Sun Nov 12, 2006 05:15am |
Coaches on field- live ball foul? | bossman72 | Football | 6 | Tue Oct 31, 2006 12:34pm |
Foul Tip: Dead or Live Ball | Gorkes | Baseball | 4 | Mon Jul 21, 2003 05:29am |