![]() |
|
|||
I second what has already been said...he is eligible since he is not in there under the numbering exception since we already have 5 "ineligible" numbers. We went all over this in our chapter a year or two ago before finally deciding on, what I felt, was the right interpretation (that 81 IS eligible)
__________________
If the play is designed to fool someone, make sure you aren't the fool. |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
numbering | ref13 | Football | 9 | Wed Oct 12, 2005 12:44pm |
Disagreement | Dukat | Softball | 2 | Sat Feb 07, 2004 01:39am |
Civil disagreement | CecilOne | Softball | 40 | Mon Oct 20, 2003 08:17am |
Disagreement with Ref | Schultj | Football | 10 | Mon Sep 08, 2003 07:15pm |
Disagreement with partner! | Dennis Nicely | Basketball | 3 | Fri Dec 10, 1999 03:39pm |