Suplex Tackle

[CT1]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

A penalty for sure. Ejection? Maybe but not a slam dunk.

Peas

Agree. The whistle was very late, and there was no apparent intent to injure.

YMMV

[BIG UMP]

PF Unnecessary roughness is a judgement call and likely here. Ejection personally, I hope not.

[ajmc]

SPIKEING the ball is an UNC foul, deliberately SPIKING a player is a big notch higher. Would that action be acceptable in a Wrestling Match?

[scrounge]

Originally Posted by ajmc

SPIKEING the ball is an UNC foul, deliberately SPIKING a player is a big notch higher. Would that action be acceptable in a Wrestling Match?

I think that exact move is worth 3 points in greco-roman wrestling

[ilyazhito]

Yes, it is, but football is not wrestling, even though wrestling skills could transfer to football tackling techniques. I think that the defensive coordinator (or position coach) of the player needs to remind him that he should not use wrestling moves in a football game.

[Rich]

The only way I'm considering ejection is if the kid is spiked on his head. Otherwise, it's 15 and we move on.

[voiceoflg]

I've seen it penalized. I've seen it not penalized. Thankfully I can count on one hand the number of times I've seen that kind of tackle in a high school game in 16 seasons.