![]() |
|
|||
Tough call. The pass was clearly complete and the receiver had possession when he became a runner. After he was hit, however, and BEFORE he contacted the ground, he appeared to lose possession of the ball (on the way down).
From the angle of the camera, you can't tell whether he had broken the plane of the goal line before, or after, he lost possession. Subsequent camera angle showed the wing official in the proper position to make that judgment. |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
fair/foul - then catch/no-catch | David Emerling | Baseball | 36 | Tue May 07, 2013 08:58am |
Catch/No Catch- Atlanta v. Chicago | biggravy | Baseball | 10 | Thu Apr 08, 2010 08:27am |
Ankiel injury - Catch/No-catch? | TxUmp | Baseball | 17 | Wed May 06, 2009 11:26pm |
Catch or no catch(foul ball)? | illiniwek8 | Baseball | 2 | Sat Mar 25, 2006 07:16pm |