The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #16 (permalink)  
Old Sun Mar 22, 2015, 07:11pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 690
Quote:
Originally Posted by crosscountry55 View Post
Well hold on, that's not what I implied. I meant there had been several travels either passed on or not seen. For the sake of consistency (which I know you, as a coach, desire), I have to take this into consideration.

If it's the first time I see it or we've made a point of calling it the whole game, than yes, absolutely I have a travel here. And it was a travel; that I'm not denying.
I don't think any good official passeson many, if any, travels he or she sees (or I should say, recognizes as a travel.)

Also BTW, while I was a high school coach for 11 years, I've now been officiating for 8. I haven't posted here much in the last couple years so I imagine many who post now don't know that when I started reading and posting here, I was still coaching.
__________________
Things turn out best for people who make the best of the way things turn out.
-- John Wooden
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old Sun Mar 22, 2015, 07:43pm
Courageous When Prudent
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hampton Roads, VA
Posts: 14,845
Quote:
Originally Posted by crosscountry55 View Post
I'm not sure why BadNewsRef said, "it depends," though I'm sure he had a technical reason. But in essence, what you listed was correct. No re-set if the team in control has the arrow. There's no "change in possession" so it's just as if the ball was deflected out of bounds by the defense.
Depends if the defense, at some point, gained possession of the ball prior to the tie up.
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old Sun Mar 22, 2015, 08:03pm
In Time Out
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 318
Quote:
Originally Posted by BadNewsRef View Post
Depends if the defense, at some point, gained possession of the ball prior to the tie up.
The reason I initially assumed it would be a fresh shot clock either way is that a held ball is essentially dual possession, so getting the ball via the arrow would be a fresh possession either way.
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old Sun Mar 22, 2015, 08:11pm
Courageous When Prudent
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hampton Roads, VA
Posts: 14,845
Quote:
Originally Posted by hbk314 View Post
The reason I initially assumed it would be a fresh shot clock either way is that a held ball is essentially dual possession, so getting the ball via the arrow would be a fresh possession either way.
A.R. 212. Player A1 attempts a try for goal and:
1. The shot-clock horn sounds while the ball is in flight. The ball does not hit the ring or flange and is simultaneously recovered by A2 and B2 for a held ball; or
2. After the try does not hit the ring or flange, it is simultaneously recovered by A2 and B2 for a held ball. The shot-clock horn does not sound.

RULING 1: A shot-clock violation has occurred and the ball is awarded to Team B at a designated spot.

2: Since the shot-clock horn has not sounded, there is no violation. The alternating-possession arrow shall be used with no reset of the shot clock when the alternating-possession arrow favors the
team that shot the ball.
(Rule 9-12.4, 9-12.1, 9-12.3 and .4, 6-4.1.a and 2-11.7.i)
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR

Last edited by Raymond; Sun Mar 22, 2015 at 08:20pm.
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old Sun Mar 22, 2015, 08:20pm
In Time Out
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 318
Quote:
Originally Posted by BadNewsRef View Post
A.R. 212. Player A1 attempts a try for goal and:
1. The shot-clock horn sounds while the ball is in flight. The ball does not hit the ring or flange and is simultaneously recovered by A2 and B2 for a held ball; or
2. After the try does not hit the ring or flange, it is simultaneously recovered by A2 and B2 for a held ball. The shot-clock horn does not sound.

RULING 1: A shot-clock violation has occurred and the ball is awarded to Team B at a designated spot.

2: Since the shot-clock horn has not sounded, there is no violation. The alternating-possession arrow shall be used with no reset of the shot clock when the alternating-possession arrow favors the
team that shot the ball.
(Rule 9-12.4, 9-12.1, 9-12.3 and .4, 6-4.1.a and 2-11.7.i)
I'm not disputing that that's the rule. I'm just explaining why it might not be obvious to the casual viewer, and why I asked to begin with.
Reply With Quote
  #21 (permalink)  
Old Sun Mar 22, 2015, 08:57pm
Courageous When Prudent
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hampton Roads, VA
Posts: 14,845
Quote:
Originally Posted by hbk314 View Post
I'm not disputing that that's the rule. I'm just explaining why it might not be obvious to the casual viewer, and why I asked to begin with.
I'd rather just post the rule than speculate what people may or may not be thinking. Always the best way to settle a rules discussion.
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old Mon Mar 23, 2015, 12:04am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 327
Quote:
Originally Posted by A Pennsylvania Coach View Post
I don't think any good official passeson many, if any, travels he or she sees (or I should say, recognizes as a travel.)
I have to disagree with this.

There HAS to have been a directive to NCAA officials regarding traveling. There are at least marginal travels on nearly every possession, particularly from players catching the ball going away from their basket. They can damn near do whatever they want to square themselves up.

And we may as well adopt the NBA's "2 step" rule because there are probably 10 plays a game that to me, are clear travels (and replays back me up), that are ignored. They aren't even commented on by most fans/announcers because they're so used to NBA-level moves. Spin moves to the basket, "Euro-steps", tucking the ball, etc. None of it gets called.

I HOPE that this isn't just officials being oblivious to what I consider quite obvious travels.
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old Mon Mar 23, 2015, 06:56am
APG APG is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 5,889


__________________
Chaos isn't a pit. Chaos is a ladder. Many who try to climb it fail and never get to try again. The fall breaks them. And some, given a chance to climb, they refuse. They cling to the realm, or the gods, or love. Illusions.

Only the ladder is real. The climb is all there is.

Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old Mon Mar 23, 2015, 07:52pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: NB/PEI, Canada
Posts: 788
Quote:
Originally Posted by MechanicGuy View Post
I have to disagree with this.

There HAS to have been a directive to NCAA officials regarding traveling. There are at least marginal travels on nearly every possession, particularly from players catching the ball going away from their basket. They can damn near do whatever they want to square themselves up.

And we may as well adopt the NBA's "2 step" rule because there are probably 10 plays a game that to me, are clear travels (and replays back me up), that are ignored. They aren't even commented on by most fans/announcers because they're so used to NBA-level moves. Spin moves to the basket, "Euro-steps", tucking the ball, etc. None of it gets called.

I HOPE that this isn't just officials being oblivious to what I consider quite obvious travels.

I don't know if its a directive or not. BUT I agree that on every possession there is footwork that is well beyond questionable. Particularly on take offs, and a lot of plays in transition.

Now the pace of the game I can see missing at times because you are trying to get angles, uncertain of gather etc. But guys changing pivot feet or lifting their back foot before the ball is out with someone watching that competitive 1 on 1 matchup come on. If footwork is being missed because guys are too worried about watching the contact then by all means get rid of the contact. But don't allow travels to occur because of contact violations are not supposed to be advantage disadvantage.
__________________
Coach: Hey ref I'll make sure you can get out of here right after the game!

Me: Thanks, but why the big rush.

Coach: Oh I thought you must have a big date . . .we're not the only ones your planning on F$%&ing tonite are we!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
St. Johns vs Villanova dunk - block/charge/doubt (Video) luvhoops Basketball 3 Sun Mar 08, 2015 06:48pm
Ohio State vs Penn State Offensive Foul Thoughts? (Video) acgod24 Basketball 20 Fri Mar 06, 2015 01:09am
Video Request -- Kansas State/Iowa State -- Block/Charge VTOfficial Basketball 0 Thu Mar 13, 2014 12:42pm
Marquette vs Villanova--Video Request stiffler3492 Basketball 41 Mon Jan 27, 2014 10:29pm
Purdue/Villanova PC upgraded to Flagrant 1 - APG video request IUgrad92 Basketball 47 Wed Nov 28, 2012 03:03pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:17pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1