The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Thu Mar 19, 2015, 04:57pm
C'mon man!!
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 966
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich View Post
Adams was just on. Said why goaltending can be supported there.

Announcers within five seconds after switching from Adams said how horrible of a call that was.

Adams shouldn't be so polite next time they have him on.
I thought it was a great call too. I also think Adams should have been more "Adams"ment that it was a good GT. Does anyone know if He has suffered a stroke in the past. He has at least 2 of the four symptoms, ie slurred speech and facial drooping.

Last edited by Sharpshooternes; Thu Mar 19, 2015 at 05:17pm.
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Thu Mar 19, 2015, 05:02pm
AremRed
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sharpshooternes View Post
I thought it was a great call too. I also think Adams should have been more "Adams"ment that it was a good GT. Does anyone know if He has suffered a stroke in the past. He has at least 2 of the door symptoms, ie slurred speech and facial drooping.
Are you having a stroke?

Quote:
Originally Posted by SCalScoreKeeper View Post
Charles Barkley defended the call.
Thread over folks, we can all go home. Charles said it was a good call.
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Thu Mar 19, 2015, 05:03pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 329
"Chance to go in" is problematic.

I also have a small problem with the T calling that from his position on the floor. If there's such a thing as being straightlined on a goaltending call, he was it.

C had the best look, though he also had the shooter, etc....

Really tough call all the way around. I can be swayed either way.
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Thu Mar 19, 2015, 05:09pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 204
Sorry if it's a dumb question, but couldn't it be BI even if the ball doesn't seem to have a chance to go in. It looks from the overhead like the ball is just barely in the cylinder by a fraction. Everyone seems to be assuming the call was GT, but would BI be defensible in this circumstance?
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Thu Mar 19, 2015, 05:18pm
C'mon man!!
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 966
Quote:
Originally Posted by AremRed View Post
Are you having a stroke?
Touché
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Thu Mar 19, 2015, 05:30pm
In Time Out
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 318
That ball had no possibility of going in. An unfortunate bailout call. It appeared to be an airball and it's debatable whether it was even still above the cylinder when he touched it. Horrible way for a game to essentially end.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sp2x4TiYTjY

Video link ^^^ I don't know if I can embed or how.

Last edited by hbk314; Thu Mar 19, 2015 at 05:35pm.
Closed Thread

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
USC-UCLA Basket Interference? (Video) frezer11 Basketball 17 Sun Jan 18, 2015 06:58pm
Video Request: Minn vs. UCLA (Video Added) JRutledge Basketball 9 Sat Mar 23, 2013 01:47pm
Usc-ucla rainmaker Basketball 6 Mon Jan 21, 2008 03:00pm
UCLA Texas & UCLA NW tcblue13 Softball 3 Mon Jun 05, 2006 04:53pm
UCLA vs AZ wadeintothem Softball 2 Sat May 07, 2005 12:57pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:14pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1