TCU & West Virg. (Video)

[crosscountry55]

1. Travel. I suppose this is what they went with given that the next clip started with the end of a WVU possession a few seconds later? If so, that was the right decision, mainly because the T was far-reaching (not sure why) into an area that the C was staying very well connected to.

2. Foul with 0.9. Excellent call. Reviewing this at the monitor, does the crew go with the moment of contact or the moment the official signals? I assume the contact but I'm not exactly sure how this works.
-----NOTE: If this were an NFHS game, unless an official has definite knowledge by seeing a few ticks fall off after the whistle, these free throws would be shot with the lane cleared. Oh the drama!

[La Rikardo]

1. I have a traveling violation on Purple #34, but the movement of the pivot foot is pretty slight. Borderline call.

2. I have a personal foul for illegal use of hands committed by Purple #5 on White #2 in the act of shooting. According to replay, the foul occurred with 0.9 seconds left on the clock.

[Raymond]

1) Travel is definite, still don't see a foul. Plus Trail is straight-lined, don't see how he has a whistle.

2) Foul, but the Lead is extremely lackadaisical in his mechanics. His urgency needs to be at the same level as the game.

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by BadNewsRef

2) Foul, but the Lead is extremely lackadaisical in his mechanics. His urgency needs to be at the same level as the game.

That is a big call, you have to act like you saw it to everyone in the gym. He does not even close down on the players.

Peace

[Camron Rust]

Originally Posted by BadNewsRef

1) Travel is definite, still don't see a foul. Plus Trail is straight-lined, don't see how he has a whistle.

2) Foul, but the Lead is extremely lackadaisical in his mechanics. His urgency needs to be at the same level as the game.

Funny how I am more often than not on the side of it being a travel when you and i disagree.

I did see a point where the foot may have come up but I couldn't be certain that the entire foot lifted so I didn't have the travel.

[Raymond]

Originally Posted by Camron Rust

Funny how I am more often than not on the side of it being a travel when you and i disagree.

I did see a point where the foot may have come up but I couldn't be certain that the entire foot lifted so I didn't have the travel.

I actually have him traveling twice. Right after he catches the ball he slides his left foot, which is then used as his pivot foot; when he makes the 180 spin trying to get out of trouble, both feet come off the ground.

But even taking that out of the equation, I do not see how the Trail can see through the 2 bodies in front of him, and then also through the back of the defender who is guarding A1.

[ballgame99]

Man, what a sequence. I think that travel call is a great call. And the foul on the elbow looks pretty clear at .9 seconds.

[Pantherdreams]

1. Three borderline travels in a row. Each on their own I might pass on or miss but in this series you've got get 1 of them.
A) Player catches and lands right left. CHanges Pivot foot to left.
B) On spin move foot pivot foot moves to an entirely new spot.
C) Ball is not out of hand before back foot it lifted.

2. Hard from camera angles but appears to be foul. Would like a better angle for me and a better angle from official.

[walt]

Foul with .9 left. Would have liked to see the lead hit it a little harder than that though.

[Rich]

Originally Posted by BadNewsRef

I actually have him traveling twice. Right after he catches the ball he slides his left foot, which is then used as his pivot foot; when he makes the 180 spin trying to get out of trouble, both feet come off the ground.

But even taking that out of the equation, I do not see how the Trail can see through the 2 bodies in front of him, and then also through the back of the defender who is guarding A1.

Yup, the first travel happens a bit before the second one happened (and got called).

Look at the sequence here (which I think was officiated well) and the end of Northern Iowa / Illinois State on which a block/charge that needed a whistle had none as the clock expired. Two videos I'm going to use at an association meeting on Wednesday night...one great end-of-game and one...not so great.

[Nevadaref]

Originally Posted by crosscountry55

1. Travel. I suppose this is what they went with given that the next clip started with the end of a WVU possession a few seconds later? If so, that was the right decision, mainly because the T was far-reaching (not sure why) into an area that the C was staying very well connected to.

2. Foul with 0.9. Excellent call. Reviewing this at the monitor, does the crew go with the moment of contact or the moment the official signals? I assume the contact but I'm not exactly sure how this works.
-----NOTE: If this were an NFHS game, unless an official has definite knowledge by seeing a few ticks fall off after the whistle, these free throws would be shot with the lane cleared. Oh the drama!

In NCAA games with a monitor, the time at which the contact occurs is used. For NFHS you are correct.