Over and back scenarios

[BillyMac]

Originally Posted by Camron Rust

Touching another player doesn't affect a player's status.

Good time to remind young officials that if a ball handler touches a person (player, substitute, coach, trainer, cheerleader, police officer in the corner, etc.) out of bounds, the ball handler is not out of bounds.

(Note: The police officer's K-9 is probably not considered a person for the interpretation of this rule. And, yes, here in my little corner of Connecticut, we do have this situation in some of our state technical high schools.)

[Nevadaref]

Originally Posted by BillyMac

Good time to remind young officials that if a ball handler touches a person (player, substitute, coach, trainer, cheerleader, police officer in the corner, etc.) out of bounds, the ball handler is not out of bounds.

(Note: The police officer's K-9 is probably not considered a person for the interpretation of this rule. And, yes, here in my little corner of Connecticut, we do have this situation in some of our state technical high schools.)

Yet another ruling which was modified due to a screw up by Mary.
Do you remember the discussion when this was published?

[Adam]

Originally Posted by Nevadaref

Yet another ruling which was modified due to a screw up by Mary.
Do you remember the discussion when this was published?

Was that an MS mistake that got fixed?

[BillyMac]

Originally Posted by Nevadaref

Yet another ruling which was modified due to a screw up by Mary. Do you remember the discussion when this was published?

No I don't. Can you elaborate?

[ChrisNE]

Thanks for the input everyone. A call in a highschool game I was watching last night had me a little confused on the third scenario.