![]() |
|
|
|
|||
|
Quote:
I thought not ![]() Don't keep issues to yourself. Get them before they become big issues because you know when they become big issues it won't be during a 40-point blowout.
__________________
"Everyone has a purpose in life, even if it's only to serve as a bad example." "If Opportunity knocks and he's not home, Opportunity waits..." "Don't you have to be stupid somewhere else?" "Not until 4." "The NCAA created this mess, so let them live with it." (JRutledge) |
|
|||
|
Couple thoughts:
1. your problems could also be a result of calling 6 games with the same crew. 2. From the way you describe things perhaps the R and the other guy are sitting on some other forum writing the same "Difficult Partner" stuff about you. You said you had to 'calm down' -- crew disputes always need to be handled calmly and tactfully, especially if you are working with people you don't know very well. Even if you are 'right' in the way you are calling things, sometimes you need to defer to the assigned R. He's the assigned crew chief (presumably, you didn't give much background) and the crew needs to march to the beat of his drum. If you have problems with the way he wants things done then report him after the game. 3. Probably not a smart idea to talk to some "other officials" at the site about your partner problems. Find one or two guys you trust and talk to them, or post here on The Forum™. ![]() 4. If you pregamed to get together with the nearest official after a tech and don't do it you can't get mad if your partner calls you out on it. Still wasn't the right time or place to call you out though. |
|
|||
|
I am really afraid we are going to have the same issue in our association with the old timers as you describe: them continuing to not call hand checks and not wanting to change. I think the rule change is great for the game.
The secondary problem I see happening is that me calling them and the other two partners not calling them makes the crew look bad. I am hoping though that the coaches recognize who is right and it won't hurt in the long run. Hopefully they will get after officials who arent calling it, since they have likely spent a lot of time couaching thier kids on it. I also have high hopes that our new varsity assigner will get people to do it or show em the highway. I really hope it improves our games. |
|
|||
|
Thanks for feedback. Reflection wise I probably should have handled the T the way we discussed. No excuse on that. Was looking more for how/when he approached me.
The comments to "other" officials in the room were made in reference to two that approached me. I did talk to a trusted official on the drive home from tourney.
|
|
|||
|
I'm not sure what part of Texas you're from, or which chapter you're in, but your one side of the story doesn't make it seem like you may have been the best partner to work with either. Maybe things happened exactly as you described, but it just comes off sounding like a young, inexperienced complainer. Talk to your assigner if you really think this guy was not following the protocol you were expected to follow. In my chapter, crew chiefs aren't assigned blindly.
|
|
|||
|
I'd prefer to hear the other side of the story before giving this guy the benefit of the doubt. Maybe the R was a jerk. I've had different partners who suggested not calling it automatically. I do anyway. The fact that the OP said the R called him out for ticky tack "and ones" is curious - especially since he claims he didn't call any at all. Something doesn't add up.
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Change in CPL (long-ish post) | HokieUmp | Baseball | 29 | Tue Apr 08, 2008 09:00pm |
| A difficult call to make, and more difficult to explain | MJT | Football | 19 | Sat Jan 29, 2005 11:06am |
| Long time no post... | brandan89 | Basketball | 21 | Wed Sep 29, 2004 05:30pm |
| A bad night and a long post | bard | Basketball | 24 | Wed Jan 08, 2003 02:09pm |
| Reply too HighSchoolWhiteHat (long post) | James Neil | Football | 6 | Wed Dec 11, 2002 11:51am |