E-mail to the top

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by just another ref

Not gonna try to explain anything else to Rut.

To summarize: Largely because of suggestions from others here, I took my cause to a higher source for a second opinion. Now many are unsatisfied with the results of this inquest. From my perspective one thing has changed. I had never seen either NCAA case before. Calling by NFHS rules, we are bound by neither, but I find the women's version infinitely more logical.

I think everybody will continue to do what they were already doing.

Until/unless something new comes to light, I think we're about done here.

You do not have to explain anything to me because what you are stating is silly. You seem to be confused with the idea of what a double whistle is that all of us have and compare it to what we do on a "blarge." Oh well, it is your issue.

Peace