E-mail to the top

[just another ref]

Rut, can you read at all?

Originally Posted by JRutledge

She did not reference the current case play....

The case number was in the subject line of the original e-mail.

....or the most important aspect of why this was even a debate.

From the second e-mail:

The main point of contention is what happens when the two officials, unfortunately, mistakenly give opposite preliminary signals and whether this changes the equation. Please advise.


Her: It does not change the equation. They still should come together and talk to make a final decision. If the decision is to go one way over another then that person goes to the table to report. If no one wants to give in, then they go to the table to report both fouls.