Quote:
Originally Posted by just another ref
True, good point. But this case says "simultaneous signals", rather than "conflicting signals" or "opposite signals." A fist in the air is also a signal. According to this wording, even if both officials have just a fist they should still get together.
|
So you take the case ruling to mean that every time 2 officials have a fist in the air they are to get together and determine the call?
In the case ruling
bob cited, you're saying the officials telepathically knew they that one was calling a PC and the other a Block?
Mon Mar 17, 2014, 07:07pm
Similar Threads
Threaded Mode
