The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Sat Feb 01, 2014, 09:43am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 9
Adam & Ref16,

I do not see how you could agree that this should have been a no call. Are you saying that because the defender grabbed 90% of the shooters hand and touched 10% of the ball, this is a no call?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Sat Feb 01, 2014, 09:47am
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,540
Quote:
Originally Posted by kung View Post
Adam & Ref16,

I do not see how you could agree that this should have been a no call. Are you saying that because the defender grabbed 90% of the shooters hand and touched 10% of the ball, this is a no call?
I thought this was not a foul. It was not obviously a foul. It looks like the defender got to the ball first and any other contact would be incidental. I would not be happy personally if I called a foul on this play after seeing it in slow motion replay. Again, that is why they call it judgment.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Sat Feb 01, 2014, 10:04am
Adam's Avatar
Keeper of the HAMMER
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MST
Posts: 27,190
Quote:
Originally Posted by kung View Post
Adam & Ref16,

I do not see how you could agree that this should have been a no call. Are you saying that because the defender grabbed 90% of the shooters hand and touched 10% of the ball, this is a no call?
The hand was on the ball, right?

Plus:

Quote:
Originally Posted by JRutledge View Post
I thought this was not a foul. It was not obviously a foul. It looks like the defender got to the ball first and any other contact would be incidental. I would not be happy personally if I called a foul on this play after seeing it in slow motion replay. Again, that is why they call it judgment.

Peace
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Sun Feb 02, 2014, 01:23pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 168
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRutledge View Post
I thought this was not a foul. It was not obviously a foul. It looks like the defender got to the ball first and any other contact would be incidental. I would not be happy personally if I called a foul on this play after seeing it in slow motion replay. Again, that is why they call it judgment.

Peace
Interesting. My feeling after watching this is at game speed I would've called a foul on Marion--3 shots. But not being on the court and not being an NBA ref perhaps they have a protocall on last second shots? As another poster stated perhaps they let players determine the outcome of the game. While that's a general premise that our crew goes by bot otoh if it's a totally obvious foul you gotta call it. This looked totally obvious
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Sun Feb 02, 2014, 01:33pm
APG APG is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 5,889
Quote:
Originally Posted by stick View Post
Interesting. My feeling after watching this is at game speed I would've called a foul on Marion--3 shots. But not being on the court and not being an NBA ref perhaps they have a protocall on last second shots? As another poster stated perhaps they let players determine the outcome of the game. While that's a general premise that our crew goes by bot otoh if it's a totally obvious foul you gotta call it. This looked totally obvious
Their protocol is to call a foul if they see a foul...and to not call a foul when they're not sure or don't think it's a foul.
__________________
Chaos isn't a pit. Chaos is a ladder. Many who try to climb it fail and never get to try again. The fall breaks them. And some, given a chance to climb, they refuse. They cling to the realm, or the gods, or love. Illusions.

Only the ladder is real. The climb is all there is.

Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Sun Feb 02, 2014, 01:39pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 168
Quote:
Originally Posted by APG View Post
Their protocol is to call a foul if they see a foul...and to not call a foul when they're not sure or don't think it's a foul.
Your probably right. I think their other protocall is never call traveling even if their is traveling.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Sun Feb 02, 2014, 01:49pm
APG APG is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 5,889
Quote:
Originally Posted by stick View Post
Your probably right. I think their other protocall is never call traveling even if their is traveling.
Or their rules provide for situations that are not traveling under their rule set where as they would be under NFHS/NCAA rule sets.
__________________
Chaos isn't a pit. Chaos is a ladder. Many who try to climb it fail and never get to try again. The fall breaks them. And some, given a chance to climb, they refuse. They cling to the realm, or the gods, or love. Illusions.

Only the ladder is real. The climb is all there is.

Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Mon Feb 03, 2014, 08:38pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 168
Quote:
Originally Posted by APG View Post
Or their rules provide for situations that are not traveling under their rule set where as they would be under NFHS/NCAA rule sets.
True 'dat
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Sun Feb 02, 2014, 01:54pm
Adam's Avatar
Keeper of the HAMMER
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MST
Posts: 27,190
Quote:
Originally Posted by stick View Post
Interesting. My feeling after watching this is at game speed I would've called a foul on Marion--3 shots. But not being on the court and not being an NBA ref perhaps they have a protocall on last second shots? As another poster stated perhaps they let players determine the outcome of the game. While that's a general premise that our crew goes by bot otoh if it's a totally obvious foul you gotta call it. This looked totally obvious
It's a horrible premise.
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Sun Feb 02, 2014, 02:03pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: SE Ohio
Posts: 1,235
Quote:
Originally Posted by stick View Post
Interesting. My feeling after watching this is at game speed I would've called a foul on Marion--3 shots. But not being on the court and not being an NBA ref perhaps they have a protocall on last second shots? As another poster stated perhaps they let players determine the outcome of the game. While that's a general premise that our crew goes by bot otoh if it's a totally obvious foul you gotta call it. This looked totally obvious
In slow-mo its hardly obvious. Looks horrible but not much to make a call on.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Sat Feb 01, 2014, 10:15am
Rich's Avatar
Get away from me, Steve.
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 15,790
Quote:
Originally Posted by kung View Post
Adam & Ref16,

I do not see how you could agree that this should have been a no call. Are you saying that because the defender grabbed 90% of the shooters hand and touched 10% of the ball, this is a no call?
You do realize that touching hand-on-ball is not a foul, right?
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Sat Feb 01, 2014, 11:57am
Courageous When Prudent
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hampton Roads, VA
Posts: 14,934
Quote:
Originally Posted by kung View Post
Adam & Ref16,

I do not see how you could agree that this should have been a no call. Are you saying that because the defender grabbed 90% of the shooters hand and touched 10% of the ball, this is a no call?
Saw it before. I remember seeing an angle where Marion gets his hand on top of the ball.
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Sun Feb 02, 2014, 12:36am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 9
Rich,

When the ball is on the left side of the shooter, the defender is on the right side of the shooter and the defender reaches across 2 sets of arms and "hits the ball". Tell me he "got all ball"
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Sun Feb 02, 2014, 10:09am
Rich's Avatar
Get away from me, Steve.
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 15,790
Quote:
Originally Posted by kung View Post
Rich,

When the ball is on the left side of the shooter, the defender is on the right side of the shooter and the defender reaches across 2 sets of arms and "hits the ball". Tell me he "got all ball"
If you were the official there and you didn't see anything but hand/ball contact, are you guessing and calling a foul anyway?
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Tue Feb 04, 2014, 07:37am
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: DE
Posts: 226
Quote:
Originally Posted by kung View Post
Rich,

When the ball is on the left side of the shooter, the defender is on the right side of the shooter and the defender reaches across 2 sets of arms and "hits the ball". Tell me he "got all ball"
Where in any rule set does it say a defender has to get "all ball"? I am in the no-call camp on this one. He hits the hand while in contact with the ball.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Reversed call on catch just another ref Baseball 2 Mon Jul 16, 2012 08:09am
Ankiel injury - Catch/No-catch? TxUmp Baseball 17 Wed May 06, 2009 11:26pm
You make the call: Catch and Award/Homerun? wadeintothem Softball 10 Mon Apr 09, 2007 08:27pm
Catch or no catch(foul ball)? illiniwek8 Baseball 2 Sat Mar 25, 2006 07:16pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:56pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1