Washington Stanford almost blarge vid request (Clip Added)

[pfan1981]

:42 left in first half. L rotated over, new T had a block, L was going to punch it the other way, but swallowed his whistle. I took some vid on my iPad but it's fairly horrendous.

Thanks,

Pfan

[APG]

[bob jenkins]

Originally Posted by pfan1981

:42 left in first half. L rotated over, new T had a block, L was going to punch it the other way, but swallowed his whistle. I took some vid on my iPad but it's fairly horrendous.

Thanks,

Pfan

Did T have a block on the primary defender (who got beat) or on the secondary defender?

This may have been a close false double foul, as opposed to a typical blarge

[PG_Ref]

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

Did T have a block on the primary defender (who got beat) or on the secondary defender?

This may have been a close false double foul, as opposed to a typical blarge

That's what I was thinking. From the endline, looks like the lead was looking at a charge with the secondary defender.

[APG]

The foul was on number 23, the defender trying for the block shot. The trail has that foul before the block/charge contact.

[bob jenkins]

Originally Posted by APG

The foul was on number 23, the defender trying for the block shot. The trail has that foul before the block/charge contact.

Good job by the L in holding the signal -- get the first foul only (despite any case plays that tell how to adjudicate it)

[APG]

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

Good job by the L in holding the signal -- get the first foul only (despite any case plays that tell how to adjudicate it)

Agreed on both points.

[Camron Rust]

Agree....T's foul was on the primary D. L's foul would have been a charge with into the secondary D.

They called the first one.

Good job by the T to come in strong knowing the combination of things that occurred and that he L was most likely only getting the secondary D.