|
|||
Quote:
First situation: wipe the shot, as it was released late. Award the free throws with the lane cleared. If the end of the game, and the shots will not affect the final score, report the foul and that's it. Second situation: ignore the foul unless intentional or flagrant. |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
Chaos isn't a pit. Chaos is a ladder. Many who try to climb it fail and never get to try again. The fall breaks them. And some, given a chance to climb, they refuse. They cling to the realm, or the gods, or love. Illusions. Only the ladder is real. The climb is all there is. |
|
|||
Agree.
__________________
Owner/Developer of RefTown.com Commissioner, Portland Basketball Officials Association |
|
|||
Correct, I was envisioning the situation in the OP being so close that the timer didn't have time to stop the clock, but it was clear that the horn went off before the shot. Unless you have definite (read: looking at the clock) knowledge of the time left, you can't put time back on the clock.
|
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR |
|
|||
Has anyone ever seen the OP actually happen?
1. I know the foul was before the buzzer. 2. I know the release was after the buzzer, so the basket doesn't count but we still shoot. As written, this is the way it is. But there is a fundamental flaw here. If I know the above things are true, then I also know that the clock should have stopped with some small amount of time still showing. If this is not the case, the airborne shooter should be allowed to finish his try regardless of when the buzzer sounded if he is fouled. Perhaps an editorial revision/minor rule change is in order.
__________________
I swear, Gus, you'd argue with a possum. It'd be easier than arguing with you, Woodrow. Lonesome Dove |
|
|||
Yes I have seen it, and I disagree that there is a fundamental flaw. I do understand the logic, and wouldn't necessarily be opposed to a change, but any time you choose to put back on the clock is just as arbitrary as zero.
|
|
|||
If there was a change, I wouldn't be for putting time back on the clock, but rather that an airborne shooter be allowed to finish after being fouled, even if the finish is after the buzzer.
__________________
I swear, Gus, you'd argue with a possum. It'd be easier than arguing with you, Woodrow. Lonesome Dove |
|
|||
Quote:
With the presence of the foul, the shooter may have been able to release the shot before the buzzer. As such, it isn't entirely fair or just to not allow them to complete the shot if fouled before the horn.
__________________
Owner/Developer of RefTown.com Commissioner, Portland Basketball Officials Association |
Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Foul at end of the game | Voolander | Basketball | 16 | Mon Jan 07, 2013 02:24pm |
FT foul during Ill/AZ St game | Nevadaref | Basketball | 1 | Tue Nov 20, 2007 09:58am |
Anger over referee's foul calls triggers a bigger foul after game | BktBallRef | Basketball | 10 | Mon Mar 06, 2006 02:36am |
Game Over or Foul? | FVB58 | Basketball | 15 | Mon Feb 13, 2006 06:34pm |
Foul at end of game | lukealex | Basketball | 8 | Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:43am |