Thoughts? (video)

[Adam]

Originally Posted by RookieDude

How so?...

That the MORE experienced observer was "upset" that a similar play DID NOT get a similar call?

Or that the LESS experienced officials "just called the game"?

(ass-u-me ing the observer was indeed MORE experienced than the calling officials)

I think his point here is that the observer wanted foul called even though there was no contact at all; just because it looked similar from his vantage point as a fan. I, too, have a problem with taking it that far.

Now, if he were to question it, and then accept their answer that there was no contact; that would be ok, IMO. But to continue to claim a foul should have been called without any contact just because the play looked similar from 110 feet away; well, that's what happens when people take a valid concept too far.