Inadvertent Whistle?

[bob jenkins]

Originally Posted by bainsey

Up until 5-6 years ago in NFHS, an inadventent whistle resulted in the possession arrow.

I don't recall that being the rule (assuming there is TC at the time of the IW)

[Camron Rust]

Originally Posted by bainsey

Up until 5-6 years ago in NFHS, an inadventent whistle resulted in the possession arrow. Perhaps the coach officiated in a time when this was the case (and he had the arrow).

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

I don't recall that being the rule (assuming there is TC at the time of the IW)

Nor do I????

[bainsey]

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

I don't recall that being the rule (assuming there is TC at the time of the IW)

This and Cam's comment gave me pause. I believe I was thinking of double fouls, not inadvertent whistles. Sorry, my mistake.

[just another ref]

In broader terms, a wise man changes his mind. You anticipate something, but something else happens, but you accidentally make the signal for what was anticipated. Tap yourself on the chest if you want, then make the correct signal. Or, if your partner made a call at the same time, you can drop you signal and walk away. It happens. There is nothing in any book which prevents it.

[BillyMac]

Originally Posted by just another ref

In broader terms ... If your partner made a call at the same time, you can drop you signal and walk away. There is nothing in any book which prevents it.

See 4.19.8 Situation C (Especially when one, or both, coaches see both signals). You're probably not going to be able to walk away, by rule, from this one.

[Adam]

Originally Posted by BillyMac

See 4.19.8 Situation C (Especially when one, or both, coaches see both signals). You're probably not going to be able to walk away, by rule, from this one.

It doesn't mean the same thing in his book as it does in everyone else's.

[just another ref]

Originally Posted by BillyMac

See 4.19.8 Situation C (Especially when one, or both, coaches see both signals). You're probably not going to be able to walk away, by rule, from this one.

The case doesn't mention
signals but if it did what the coach saw or didn't see would not affect the call.

[BillyMac]

Originally Posted by just another ref

The case doesn't mention
signals.

"One official calls a blocking foul on B1 and the other official calls a charging foul on A1"

Without signals, just exactly how are two officials going to "call" two different fouls? Without signals it would just be a race to the table to see who gets there, and makes the "call", first.

[Adam]

Originally Posted by BillyMac

"One official calls a blocking foul on B1 and the other official calls a charging foul on A1"

Without signals, just exactly how are two officials going to "call" two different fouls? Without signals it would just be a race to the table to see who gets there, and makes the "call", first.

jar thinks the case play means both officials are stubborn and refuse to come to a consensus. jar is the only one here who thinks this. This discussion will go nowhere. Again.