![]() |
|
|||
My honest opinion
I've seen a ton of calls I have not agreed with so far this tourney season (men and women).
The above mentioned Baylor-Louisville game is the most controversial. My biggest complaint about the tourney has not been with the officiating, it is with the rules. How many times have we witnessed a team without a timeout remaining getting extra time while the officials review how much time is on the clock. This rule has the potential to significantly alter the ending of a game. The handling of clock issues should be the same as rule 5-10 of the NFHS book. Spending 2 minutes to determine if the clock should read 2.3 or 2.4 remaining is ridiculous when it gives a team what amounts to an additional time out to set up a play they otherwise would not have a chance to set up if the element of human error was still allowed. If the officials know an error occurred then they should be allowed to review, which has happened a couple times this tourney (like a full second off the clock for example), but when we are talking about the margin of human error) roughly .14 for reaction time we are to nit picky. |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
rate of pay for umpires | dudeinblue | Baseball | 54 | Thu Jul 14, 2005 11:16pm |
Should Coaches Rate...What is the Alternative? | Ed Hickland | Football | 13 | Sat Jun 04, 2005 12:40pm |
Where does the PAC 10 conference rate? | Malcolm Tucker | Basketball | 8 | Sat May 28, 2005 09:58pm |
Should Coaches Rate? | Ed Hickland | Football | 22 | Tue Mar 30, 2004 08:43pm |
Rate my partner | Mark Padgett | Basketball | 68 | Fri May 17, 2002 05:56am |