The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #16 (permalink)  
Old Fri Feb 22, 2013, 02:00pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 520
Quote:
Originally Posted by APG View Post
For a guy that wasn't using the word "conspiracy,' your post looks, smells, and acts as one. If you have questions about plays, talk about the plays...don't opine about your perceptions of one team/player always "getting questionable calls."
Ok sorry, I did not realize my post came across that strongly, but guess it's ruffled some feathers. Let me reprhase then please:

Did anyone see the block/charge play that happened around the 9 minute mark where the VT player is called for the PC? Or about 3 minutes later on other end where VT player is called for a block? If anyone could post video of these plays I would like to hear some opinions..thanks.
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old Fri Feb 22, 2013, 02:01pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 3,505
Quote:
Originally Posted by kk13 View Post
I think they missed a push which is why the Duke player was on the floor in the first place!
Isn't that the only way a Duke player gets on the floor? When pushed by the opponent?
__________________
in OS I trust
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old Sat Feb 23, 2013, 12:10pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: West Orange, NJ
Posts: 2,583
Here's the kick ball situation...

__________________
"Everyone has a purpose in life, even if it's only to serve as a bad example."
"If Opportunity knocks and he's not home, Opportunity waits..."
"Don't you have to be stupid somewhere else?" "Not until 4."
"The NCAA created this mess, so let them live with it." (JRutledge)
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old Sat Feb 23, 2013, 12:33pm
We don't rent pigs
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 7,627
And the second Duke guy rolled from front to back with it after recovering the ball.
__________________
I swear, Gus, you'd argue with a possum.
It'd be easier than arguing with you, Woodrow.


Lonesome Dove
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old Sat Feb 23, 2013, 04:21pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 3,505
Oh my. Not to question the integrity of these guys but at the D1 level to not call that kick and then to let the player roll from belly to back with the ball and not have a call. If it's not integrity then its incompetence. Either way its something starting with an "in".
__________________
in OS I trust
Reply With Quote
  #21 (permalink)  
Old Sat Feb 23, 2013, 04:28pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: In the offseason.
Posts: 12,263
Quote:
Originally Posted by deecee View Post
Oh my. Not to question the integrity of these guys but at the D1 level to not call that kick and then to let the player roll from belly to back with the ball and not have a call. If it's not integrity then its incompetence. Either way its something starting with an "in".
I don't know that it is either of those...it is just some officials look for anyway they can to wiggle out of making a call at all even though it really isn't that complicated. Some find it easier to pass on a close call even though it would be the right call. Why? They like taking the easier road where they can slough it off rather than have to step up and make a decision.
__________________
Owner/Developer of RefTown.com
Commissioner, Portland Basketball Officials Association
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old Sat Feb 23, 2013, 08:24pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,169
Entirely possible neither official could see (or thought to look to see) if the "kick" was inentional and not inadvertant.

Foul on the white player in the nearer side during the rebound?
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old Sat Feb 23, 2013, 08:29pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: West Orange, NJ
Posts: 2,583
Quote:
Originally Posted by bob jenkins View Post
Entirely possible neither official could see (or thought to look to see) if the "kick" was inentional and not inadvertant.
The one to see it would've been the C (Ed Corbett, my old Cath. League assignor). I'd love to give him the benefit of the doubt but he was looking right at it. Bringing the ball in to yourself with your feet isn't exactly inadvertent.
__________________
"Everyone has a purpose in life, even if it's only to serve as a bad example."
"If Opportunity knocks and he's not home, Opportunity waits..."
"Don't you have to be stupid somewhere else?" "Not until 4."
"The NCAA created this mess, so let them live with it." (JRutledge)
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old Sat Feb 23, 2013, 08:33pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,169
Quote:
Originally Posted by JetMetFan View Post
The one to see it would've been the C (Ed Corbett, my old Cath. League assignor). I'd love to give him the benefit of the doubt but he was looking right at it. Bringing the ball in to yourself with your feet isn't exactly inadvertent.
2 blue is right between the official and the ball. Then, the white player is swinging around and I would be lookiung to see if he's going to do anything illegal.

Shouldn't have been missed, I'm not trying to justify it. But, s*** happens.
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old Sat Feb 23, 2013, 10:32pm
Courageous When Prudent
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hampton Roads, VA
Posts: 14,934
Quote:
Originally Posted by bob jenkins View Post
Entirely possible neither official could see (or thought to look to see) if the "kick" was inentional and not inadvertant.

Foul on the white player in the nearer side during the rebound?
Maybe if the C decided to engage himself in the play he would have seen the travel. Not sure about the kick b/c it looks like the ball just happened to end up betwwen his legs inadvertently.
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR
Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old Sun Feb 24, 2013, 11:49am
(Something hilarious)
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: These United States
Posts: 1,162
My other issue with this was that the old L new T didn't adjust (read MOVE AT ALL) on the rebound. I was watching this and was pretty amazed at both non-calls. Ouch.

And for all of the "maybe the C or whoever couldn't tell how the ball ended up between the legs" or whatever proponents, I'm going out on a limb that the play breakdown by the supervisor is saying that those are two bad INC's. I would hope.

I'd be fairly mortified if I was the C or new T (or even new L) on that series in my game.
__________________
I can't remember the last time I wasn't at least kind-of tired.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
onsides kick on the free kick BuggBob Football 7 Tue Dec 06, 2011 05:29pm
Drop kick on Free kick, on 40 or behind it? airraider Football 6 Wed Oct 05, 2011 11:43am
Another Kick question (free kick) referee20 Football 15 Wed Sep 16, 2009 08:14pm
Duke vs. BC IREFU2 Basketball 57 Mon Feb 06, 2006 04:40pm
Bye Bye Duke rgaudreau Basketball 14 Mon Mar 25, 2002 10:53am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:29pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1