The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Mon Feb 11, 2013, 02:18pm
Medium Kahuna
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: At home
Posts: 791
Your case is not entirely clear: if the administering official signaled 2 FT's, then you'd have a CE situation. But it sounds as if he did not try to recover the ball after the first attempt or prepare for the second.

You could have called it a CE situation and resumed from the POI, which would be a throw-in for A on the OOB violation by B (2.10.1J). But a better solution would be to treat it as "erroneous information," kill it immediately, and go to the arrow (8.6.1).

But either way in this case it sounds as if A will get the ball — only question is whether they give up the arrow to get it.
__________________
Never trust an atom: they make up everything.
Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Clarification on Appeal Play matstars Baseball 4 Fri Jun 06, 2008 06:57pm
Some clarification of NCAA kick play ljudge Football 2 Wed Oct 25, 2006 09:06pm
Question Re: ASA website June Clarification on Runner Interference Play HawkeyeCubP Softball 5 Thu Jul 06, 2006 03:34pm
Need a little clarification David B Baseball 22 Mon Apr 26, 2004 10:05am
Rule Clarification to a play we discussed Self Basketball 51 Fri Aug 09, 2002 07:22pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:03pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1