Rule Clarification to a play we discussed

[Self]

Not sure if any one remembers but we had a huge(very long) discussion on the belwo play:

B1 scores a basket and A1 grabs the ball from teh net and immediately throws it to a breaking away A2 running down the court. The problem is A1 never stepped out of bounds for the throw in.

The answers we discussed were the below 3, no consencous on the board and actually no consencous between IAABBO and NFHS and state HS.

The 3 answers:
1.) This is a violation
2.) This is a delay of game warning.
3.) It is a do over, blow your whistle and reset the thrown in.

These were the 3 answers that we all battled with. No need to battle any more.. NFHS has clarified the rule and also put in case study examples.

RULE 9-2-2, Added language that clarifies a throw-in must be made from out of bounds. While a seemingly obvious editorial revision, that clarification reveals intent of the NFHS committee: A throw in by a player is is not out of bounds at teh time results in a VIOLATION... Congrats to all who chose violation back then.

In the case book it goes on and gives the exact above play to further clarify it is a violation. Now there is no confusion......