Indirect T and coach to sit

[bob jenkins]

Originally Posted by junruh07

That's not quite right I don't think. The OP issued a DOG warning, then a T when it happened again. At least that's how I read it. In any case, the DOG T is issued to the team, not to the player right? It is not charged indirectly to the coach.

My (apparent) mistake. I was thinking it was a FT violation (I had two on the same player yesterday), not during a throw-in.

Originally Posted by maroonx

So how many indirect T's does a coach get before sitting?

What do you think? Why?

[Camron Rust]

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

My (apparent) mistake. I was thinking it was a FT violation (I had two on the same player yesterday), not during a throw-in.

And why would that matter?

[bob jenkins]

Originally Posted by Camron Rust

And why would that matter?

Breaking the plane (lane or 3-point arc, depending) on a FT is a violation, whether done once, twice or a dozen times (unless you think it's that old intentional ploy to get a shooter to make a FT instead of miss).

On a throw-in, it's a warning, and then a T.

I originally had it as the former; the play was really the latter.

[Raymond]

maroonx, are you officiating games this season? If so you really need to get your hands on a rule book.

[Camron Rust]

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

Breaking the plane (lane or 3-point arc, depending) on a FT is a violation, whether done once, twice or a dozen times (unless you think it's that old intentional ploy to get a shooter to make a FT instead of miss).

On a throw-in, it's a warning, and then a T.

I originally had it as the former; the play was really the latter.

OK, good, It appeared to me that you were suggesting that two DOG violations relating to FTs (huddling) would be a player T. I didn't think you were trying to say that, but I was left wondering.