The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Sun Feb 10, 2013, 08:20am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Maryland
Posts: 157
Indirect T and coach to sit

Saw a game where ref gave team breaking the plane warning and then T for doing it 2nd time. Official assessed Indirect to team and made coach sit. Big argument. No other T issued. Coach said 2 indirect Technicals. 15 minute delay in game.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Sun Feb 10, 2013, 08:32am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,019
Unless there's more to the story, it shouldn't have been a T.

Even if it was, it was to a player, so shouldn't be indirect to coach.

Don't know what coach (or OP) meant by "2 indirect Ts".

Whatever the charlie-foxtrot, it shouldn't take 15 minutes to resume.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Sun Feb 10, 2013, 08:53am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Kansas
Posts: 65
Quote:
Originally Posted by bob jenkins View Post
Unless there's more to the story, it shouldn't have been a T.

Even if it was, it was to a player, so shouldn't be indirect to coach.

Don't know what coach (or OP) meant by "2 indirect Ts".

Whatever the charlie-foxtrot, it shouldn't take 15 minutes to resume.
That's not quite right I don't think. The OP issued a DOG warning, then a T when it happened again. At least that's how I read it. In any case, the DOG T is issued to the team, not to the player right? It is not charged indirectly to the coach.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Sun Feb 10, 2013, 11:22am
Medium Kahuna
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: At home
Posts: 791
Quote:
Originally Posted by junruh07 View Post
That's not quite right I don't think. The OP issued a DOG warning, then a T when it happened again. At least that's how I read it. In any case, the DOG T is issued to the team, not to the player right? It is not charged indirectly to the coach.
Agree. Correct, it's a team technical, 10-1-5c, not charged to player or coach (coach not required to sit).
__________________
Never trust an atom: they make up everything.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Sun Feb 10, 2013, 11:49am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Maryland
Posts: 157
So how many indirect T's does a coach get before sitting?
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Sun Feb 10, 2013, 12:20pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,019
Quote:
Originally Posted by junruh07 View Post
That's not quite right I don't think. The OP issued a DOG warning, then a T when it happened again. At least that's how I read it. In any case, the DOG T is issued to the team, not to the player right? It is not charged indirectly to the coach.
My (apparent) mistake. I was thinking it was a FT violation (I had two on the same player yesterday), not during a throw-in.

Quote:
Originally Posted by maroonx View Post
So how many indirect T's does a coach get before sitting?
What do you think? Why?
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Sun Feb 10, 2013, 12:48pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: In the offseason.
Posts: 12,260
Quote:
Originally Posted by bob jenkins View Post
My (apparent) mistake. I was thinking it was a FT violation (I had two on the same player yesterday), not during a throw-in.
And why would that matter?
__________________
Owner/Developer of RefTown.com
Commissioner, Portland Basketball Officials Association
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Sun Feb 10, 2013, 01:54pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,019
Quote:
Originally Posted by Camron Rust View Post
And why would that matter?
Breaking the plane (lane or 3-point arc, depending) on a FT is a violation, whether done once, twice or a dozen times (unless you think it's that old intentional ploy to get a shooter to make a FT instead of miss).

On a throw-in, it's a warning, and then a T.

I originally had it as the former; the play was really the latter.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Sun Feb 10, 2013, 01:59pm
Courageous When Prudent
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hampton Roads, VA
Posts: 14,843
maroonx, are you officiating games this season? If so you really need to get your hands on a rule book.
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Sun Feb 10, 2013, 02:10pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: In the offseason.
Posts: 12,260
Quote:
Originally Posted by bob jenkins View Post
Breaking the plane (lane or 3-point arc, depending) on a FT is a violation, whether done once, twice or a dozen times (unless you think it's that old intentional ploy to get a shooter to make a FT instead of miss).

On a throw-in, it's a warning, and then a T.

I originally had it as the former; the play was really the latter.
OK, good, It appeared to me that you were suggesting that two DOG violations relating to FTs (huddling) would be a player T. I didn't think you were trying to say that, but I was left wondering.
__________________
Owner/Developer of RefTown.com
Commissioner, Portland Basketball Officials Association
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Sun Feb 10, 2013, 03:04pm
NFHS Official
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 1,734
Quote:
Originally Posted by maroonx View Post
so how many indirect t's does a coach get before sitting?
1 I think.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Sun Feb 10, 2013, 07:56pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 57
Quote:
Originally Posted by maroonx View Post
So how many indirect T's does a coach get before sitting?
Only one. But indirect technicals on the coach are limited to fouls committed by bench personnel: players, coaches, managers and others that are on the team bench. That also includes players that are warming up during pre-game (the most common technical foul during warmups is dunking or grasping the rim). The head coach is responsible for the conduct of his bench, and thus he is penalized for any fouls committed by his bench.

The difference mainly between an indirect and a direct technical foul is you get three indirect technical fouls, or a combination of three indirect and direct technical fouls before it results in an ejection.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Indirect or just a Team T Just Curious Basketball 1 Wed Dec 21, 2005 02:30am
Indirect T in Fed Games ? carldog Basketball 3 Mon Feb 07, 2005 02:57pm
Indirect on head coach or not? Fifth And Goal Basketball 22 Fri Jan 21, 2005 09:47am
Indirect Technical - what next? Robmoz Basketball 19 Tue Jun 15, 2004 12:50pm
indirect T on coach foxwhistler Basketball 5 Tue Nov 04, 2003 01:42am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:05am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1