Quote:
Originally Posted by seanwestref
I meant "offensive" in the way that DJ fouled Horford, not meaning a charge or anything. I agree that DJ elbowed Horford, but the nut-shot looked inadvertent. I understand the video review, but how can they retroactively issue a technical for that contact? I understand reviewing video to determine F1/F2 calls, but to issue a different foul entirely? Is this just the NBA or can NCAA do this as well?
|
When you speak about NBA rulings, using offensive foul has very specific meaning under the rule set.
Under NBA rules, when reviewing a flagrant foul they may review any unsportsmanlike acts that occur immediately prior to and after the call.
__________________
Chaos isn't a pit. Chaos is a ladder. Many who try to climb it fail and never get to try again. The fall breaks them. And some, given a chance to climb, they refuse. They cling to the realm, or the gods, or love. Illusions.
Only the ladder is real. The climb is all there is.
|
Tue Feb 05, 2013, 11:23pm
Similar Threads
Threaded Mode
