![]() |
|
|
|||
Huh?
__________________
Making Every Effort to Be in the Right Place at the Right Time, Looking at the Right Thing to Make the Right Call |
|
|||
The rule book defines simultaneous violations. The considered advice of esteemed forum members is not to call them except during free throws. Pick one.
__________________
Never trust an atom: they make up everything. |
|
|||
Reference (other that during FTs) please.
|
|
|||
Ah -- thanks.
I guess I should read the rule book more. ![]() So, the answer to the test question in the OP is apparently "yes" (unless they are testing "double violation" vs. "simultaneous violation") |
|
|||
Say It Isn't So, Ethyl!!!
![]() ![]() ![]() This session of the "Always Listen to Bob" Raving Admiration Society (ALBRAS) is temporarily recessed while we figure all this out. No, don't panic. There might be a reasonable explanation for it. He might have hit his head on something.
__________________
Making Every Effort to Be in the Right Place at the Right Time, Looking at the Right Thing to Make the Right Call |
|
|||
In the case of simultaneous fouls, you can have a foul on a shooter that is clearly after some other foul, but is still considered simultaneous because the act of shooting is not an instantaneous action, and has duration.
WRT the OP - and other instantaneous violations, I stick by my original answer. One of them happened first. Figure out which one it was.
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'” West Houston Mike |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Videos of Violations | SWLARef | Basketball | 3 | Mon Oct 22, 2012 03:01pm |
Two violations | Scrapper1 | Basketball | 24 | Sun Oct 26, 2008 11:31am |
Violations.....or not? | Illini_Ref | Basketball | 19 | Sat Feb 23, 2008 10:08am |
More backcourt violations | lukealex | Basketball | 3 | Mon Feb 28, 2005 01:05pm |
Lane Violations | nathan | Basketball | 1 | Tue Dec 09, 2003 07:46am |