Travel or Not?

[just another ref]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

The standard is mine.

Your standard is also to make a strong statement on one side of an issue, usually which in and of itself is sound. But when questioned on the other side of the same issue, you are repetitive and evasive and often totally ignore the question.

But that's okay.

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by just another ref

Your standard is also to make a strong statement on one side of an issue, usually which in and of itself is sound. But when questioned on the other side of the same issue, you are repetitive and evasive and often totally ignore the question.

But that's okay.

It is not my place to help you understand what is commonly applied by many. If you do not get the basic concept not sure what to tell you. Not being evasive, just do not understand why you are having trouble understanding that I want to call obvious fouls or violations without having to YouTube it and slow it down.

I also did not invent the concept and I have nothing to hide by stating my opinion. I am sorry I cannot figure out what you are looking for in this conversation.

Peace

[just another ref]

It's like trying to keep cattle in the pasture.

"I checked the north fence and it's secure."

What about the south fence?

I checked the north fence from one end to the other. I tightened the wire in a couple of places. It's good now."

What about the east fence?

"I sat there for a while and watched and nothing got out of the north fence."

Half the cows are out. A tree fell on the west fence.

"The north fence is strong. Why is that so hard to understand."