Simeon (IL) vs DeSoto (TX) Blarge

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by just another ref

This is a new question. Does verbalizing the conflicting calls obligate them to go with both? I don't see why that wouldn't be the same as conflicting signals.

Maybe because the casebook is clear?

Why are you really having an issue with this obvious situation?

Peace

[just another ref]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

Maybe because the casebook is clear?

Why are you really having an issue with this obvious situation?

Peace

The casebook specifically mentions neither signals nor a verbal indication, so they seem to me to be on equal footing.

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by just another ref

The casebook specifically mentions neither signals nor a verbal indication, so they seem to me to be on equal footing.

That seems to me and others that is the problem right here.

Peace

[Raymond]

Originally Posted by just another ref

The casebook specifically mentions neither signals nor a verbal indication, so they seem to me to be on equal footing.

What do you tell your supervisor(s)?

[just another ref]

Originally Posted by BadNewsRef

What do you tell your supervisor(s)?

None of this has ever come up.

[Raymond]

Originally Posted by just another ref

None of this has ever come up.

So your supervisors don't know that in your games you will not allow blarges?

I think you need to be a trailblazer and let them know your thoughts how things should be done in your area.

[just another ref]

Originally Posted by BadNewsRef

So your supervisors don't know that in your games you will not allow blarges?
I think you need to be a trailblazer and let them know your thoughts how things should be done in your area.

Our varsity assignor is not so much a supervisor as a dispatcher. When we have rule discussions at meetings, I usually am the one who has the last word. (scary, huh?)

I see this as a non-issue. The only way a blarge and this case play will get my attention is if they are a part of a study guide or test question.