Inadvertent whistle

[JRutledge]

It is actually called an accidental whistle. Inadvertent whistle is a football term.

With that being said, they go to the AP if he blew the whistle for a violation and the ball was not in possession. Team A would get the ball if they had the arrow. But it does not sound like that might not have been the case here.

Peace

[maven]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

With that being said, they go to the AP if he blew the whistle for a violation and the ball was not in possession.

No team control during a throw-in for your games?

[MD Longhorn]

Why is this a question?

[Adam]

Originally Posted by maven

No team control during a throw-in for your games?

Does team control continue after B1 tips the ball?

[maven]

Originally Posted by Adam

Does team control continue after B1 tips the ball?

Yes.

And, even if it didn't, in the OP team A seems to be in player control of the ball when the IW is blown, and thus has team control.

[Eastshire]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

It is actually called an accidental whistle. Inadvertent whistle is a football term.

With that being said, they go to the AP if he blew the whistle for a violation and the ball was not in possession. Team A would get the ball if they had the arrow. But it does not sound like that might not have been the case here.

Peace

Check 4-36-1.

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by Eastshire

Check 4-36-1.

Are you sure that is the rule you want to go with?

It is better to look at 4-36-2a and even that is not what took place.

4-12-3c says team control continues until the ball becomes dead. Well the whistle makes the play dead and no one is in control of the ball.

Peace

[Eastshire]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

Are you sure that is the rule you want to go with?

It is better to look at 4-36-2a and even that is not what took place.

4-12-3c says team control continues until the ball becomes dead. Well the whistle makes the play dead and no one is in control of the ball.

Peace

Sorry, I was referring to "inadvertent whistle" being used as a term with that reference.

[Bad Zebra]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

It is actually called an accidental whistle. Inadvertent whistle is a football term...

4-36-1
Point of interruption: Method of resuming play due to officials INADVERTENT WHISTLE...

(This ruling brought to you courtesy of the 2012-13 NFHS iphone app)

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by Bad Zebra

4-36-1
Point of interruption: Method of resuming play due to officials INADVERTENT WHISTLE...

(This ruling brought to you courtesy of the 2012-13 NFHS iphone app)

You do realize that POI can be an AP application right?

Peace

[Bad Zebra]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

You do realize that POI can be an AP application right?

Peace

Yes. I was just confirming that the term Inadvertent Whistle was in fact a basketball term (since I have been using for many years)

[bob jenkins]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

It is actually called an accidental whistle. Inadvertent whistle is a football term.

With that being said, they go to the AP if he blew the whistle for a violation and the ball was not in possession. Team A would get the ball if they had the arrow. But it does not sound like that might not have been the case here.

Peace

The ball was still in TC, even if it wasn't in PC (or "posession.")

Use POI for an IW. Since there was TC, it goes back to A for a throw-in.

[Nevadaref]

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

The ball was still in TC, even if it wasn't in PC (or "posession.")

Use POI for an IW. Since there was TC, it goes back to A for a throw-in.

I concur. The only caveat with respect to the question asked by the OP is that the throw-in for team A will be at the OOB spot nearest to where the ball was located when the whistle sounded. This may not result in a throw-in on the endline. In this instance, where the original throw-in came from is not a factor in deciding from where to award the new throw-in.

[Bad Zebra]

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

The ball was still in TC, even if it wasn't in PC (or "posession.")

Use POI for an IW. Since there was TC, it goes back to A for a throw-in.

Ha! Alphabet soup!

[Camron Rust]

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

The ball was still in TC, even if it wasn't in PC (or "posession.")

Use POI for an IW. Since there was TC, it goes back to A for a throw-in.

(EDIT: My comment below is only in reference to the point about their being team control or not, not what you do with the IW)


Is that really true now since they basically said all other rules are as they were as before on that issue where the only thing that changes is that you can have a team control foul during a throwin....which is not necessarily the same as having team control. (You can have a PC foul without PC in the case of an airborne shooter).