NFHS Backcourt

[Camron Rust]

Originally Posted by Stat-Man

Saw this play yesterday (MS Girls).

A1 dribbles and stops with one foot in front court and one foot in back court.

A1 passes to A2 in back court.

Trail calls an emphatic backcourt violation.

I was under the impression ball -and- both feet had to be in the front court for the pass to A2 to be a violation.

Assuming A1's foot remained in contact with the backcourt until the ball was released, you would be correct (that it was not a violation).

However, if A1 (who was holding the ball) were to lift that backcourt foot, they would instantly gain frontcourt status. Such a lifted foot gains frontcourt status not by touching in the frontcourt but because the other foot is in the frontcourt and the lifted foot is not touching the backcourt.

[Stat-Man]

Originally Posted by Camron Rust

Assuming A1's foot remained in contact with the backcourt until the ball was released, you would be correct (that it was not a violation).

However, if A1 (who was holding the ball) were to lift that backcourt foot, they would instantly gain frontcourt status. Such a lifted foot gains frontcourt status not by touching in the frontcourt but because the other foot is in the frontcourt and the lifted foot is not touching the backcourt.

Camron:

When I checked the case book, I found Case 9.9.1 which you've described above.

Originally Posted by Bob Jenkins

Both you and the official are wrong (as described).

Thanks for the explanation/clarification, Bob.

[BillyMac]

Originally Posted by Stat-Man

Thanks for the explanation/clarification, Bob.

Always listen to bob.