NFHS Backcourt
Saw this play yesterday (MS Girls).
A1 dribbles and stops with one foot in front court and one foot in back court. A1 passes to A2 in back court. Trail calls an emphatic backcourt violation. I was under the impression ball -and- both feet had to be in the front court for the pass to A2 to be a violation. :confused: |
Both you and the official are wrong (as described).
You: The "three points rule" applies only to a dribble from the BC to the FC. Since the dribble had ended, that rule doesn't apply. Official: If a player is touching the BC and the FC, the player is in the BC. So, a pass to another player in the BC would be legal. That said, if A1 lifted the foot that was in the BC, A1 is now in the FC, and a pass to the BC would be illegal. |
Quote:
However, if A1 (who was holding the ball) were to lift that backcourt foot, they would instantly gain frontcourt status. Such a lifted foot gains frontcourt status not by touching in the frontcourt but because the other foot is in the frontcourt and the lifted foot is not touching the backcourt. |
Quote:
When I checked the case book, I found Case 9.9.1 which you've described above. Quote:
|
Quote:
|
He's Back ...
Quote:
|
Backcourt Violation
Quote:
Backcourt Violation?? |
Quote:
Team control (and player control established at some point if coming from a throw-in) Ball achieves a front court position Team in control is last to touch the ball when the ball had a frontcourt status Team in control is the first to touch the ball after it's achieved a backcourt status. With that, do you have a violation? Reading up on player position may help with your question. |
Quote:
Now, Did I get the call right? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
same call
|
Another spin... A1 is now in FC and B1 bats ball into the air toward A's BC. A1 goes back court and catches it prior to the ball touching the court... What now? Do we go with the rule or the Interpretation?
|
Quote:
So there is no conflict. Even if I didn't do that, I'm going with the rule because, with the conflict, the interpretation doesn't even make common sense....from the point of view of whether it is "right" for that to be a violation. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:06pm. |