Call on the court = Block. Your opinion?

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by 7IronRef

Rut-h*le, I knew you couldn't let it go old timer.

I understand that people see this as a 50-50 play. All I have said and continue to say is that since this is a college play, and you are a college official that has said that you follow the guidelines now in use, that I disagree with your application of those guidelines and therefore your judgement on the play is ICC.

OK, so you're not a golf guy or basketball guy

Keep up or get out

Enjoy

Your season ended before mine did right? Seems like someone needs to look in the mirror.

Peace

[7IronRef]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

Your season ended before mine did right? Seems like someone needs to look in the mirror.

Peace

Can't say for sure whose season ended first. The schedule in ILL lends itself to you working later in the YEAR. I seriously doubt you worked deeper in the playoffs than I did.

The mirror treats me pretty well olden one

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by 7IronRef

Can't say for sure whose season ended first. The schedule in ILL lends itself to you working later in the YEAR. I seriously doubt you worked deeper in the playoffs than I did.

The mirror treats me pretty well olden one

If I am old, you must be 20 years old. And I am probably in much better shape than most officials I come in contact with, including you.

Peace

[7IronRef]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

If I am old, you must be 20 years old. And I am probably in much better shape than most officials I come in contact with, ...

Peace

That's what old timers always say. The old "I challenge you to an officiating duel" is next I am sure.

Not that it matters but 33 yr old...you probably can't remember that far back

[tref]

This argument is so 27 seconds ago

Both of you guys post an entire game & let us, the posters of the Forum, make the final call on "whose got game."

[7IronRef]

Originally Posted by tref

This argument is so 27 seconds ago

Both of you guys post an entire game & let us, the posters of the Forum, make the final call on "whose got game."

I agree it is old, but it is Rut who can't let it go. He said he was done with it, but keeps coming back, because he can't move on. He will surely bring it up in other posts, even if he doesn't come back to this thread. He always has to have the last word, hence 18,000+ posts, the twisting of the truth and back tracking.

He prolongs the conversations so that he can make a name for himself at the expense of others...

Rut, say my name

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by 7IronRef

I agree it is old, but it is Rut who can't let it go. He said he was done with it, but keeps coming back, because he can't move on.

For the record, I had not said anything to you since your last post until today. I have not said anything to you because as I said you are a non-MF factor to me. You came back and commented about something after you claim I wanted the last word. Now you are still talking about me after several days have past. We have even gone on with the conversation of the OP and you came back still talking. So if I have not let it go, as I said look in the mirror.

Originally Posted by 7IronRef

He will surely bring it up in other posts, even if he doesn't come back to this thread. He always has to have the last word, hence 18,000+ posts, the twisting of the truth and back tracking.

Are you sure? I might bring it up because someone else makes a joke about it or comments about it like people like to do. If you have not noticed not too many people take themselves that seriously here including me. Most of us here have nothing to prove to each other as we are secure in ourselves, which you seem to not be very secure in yourself. If you were, you would not worry about what I was thinking on a play and you were too stupid to read that other people agreed with me. You still have not addressed two people that pointed out to you that they did not agree with your assessment on the plays and that others agreed with me, go figure.

You are like a lot of others trolls that have been here and have gone in a week or so when your career either has fallen off or someone figures you out and who you really are.

Originally Posted by 7IronRef

He prolongs the conversations so that he can make a name for himself at the expense of others...

Rut, say my name

I do not need to know what your name is at all. But you can look mine up and find it in Illinois that is for sure. And there have been about 20 posts (since page 5) since the last time you was on this thread. Maybe if you would stop acting like a little girl and man up, you would not worry about what I have to say to you at all. If you do not want me to have the last word, say anything to you or acknowledge your existence, then do not talk to me at all. Trust me, you are not that important.

Now back to our regularly scheduled programming.

Peace

[dsqrddgd909]

Originally Posted by tref

This argument is so 27 seconds ago

Both of you guys post an entire game & let us, the posters of the Forum, make the final call on "whose got game."

I haven't seen 7 iron ref, but I have seen JRut work in a game that featured one team that ran the Grinnell system.

Now JRut doesn't need any affirmation from me, but I have seen a lot of games officiated by the best in three different associations and Rut was as good as any I've seen. Very crisp signals, positioning, communication and the man is in very good shape (better than 90% of the officials I have seen or worked with.)

[tref]

Originally Posted by dsqrddgd909

I haven't seen 7 iron ref, but I have seen JRut work in a game that featured one team that ran the Grinnell system.

Now JRut doesn't need any affirmation from me, but I have seen a lot of games officiated by the best in three different associations and Rut was as good as any I've seen. Very crisp signals, positioning, communication and the man is in very good shape (better than 90% of the officials I have seen or worked with.)

I've actually seen a bit of him on the court as well, I believe he posted a link or something to one of his games a couple years back.
From what I remember, he not only looked the part but he had some presence about himself too. I didnt think he was an old timer either...

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by dsqrddgd909

I haven't seen 7 iron ref, but I have seen JRut work in a game that featured one team that ran the Grinnell system.

Now JRut doesn't need any affirmation from me, but I have seen a lot of games officiated by the best in three different associations and Rut was as good as any I've seen. Very crisp signals, positioning, communication and the man is in very good shape (better than 90% of the officials I have seen or worked with.)

And the fact you say this with our blarge, that must say a lot.

Peace

[Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.]

Originally Posted by 7IronRef

That's what old timers always say. The old "I challenge you to an officiating duel" is next I am sure.

Not that it matters but 33 yr old...you probably can't remember that far back

7IronRef:

Big deal, I can quote the appropriate Casebook Plays from 1971 that apply to the two videos we are discussing. Can you?

MTD, Sr.

[Adam]

Originally Posted by Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.

7IronRef:

Big deal, I can quote the appropriate Casebook Plays from 1971 that apply to the two videos we are discussing. Can you?

MTD, Sr.

Doubtful he can spell "case plays" without copy and paste.

[HawkeyeCubP]

Everyone has fault, and faults. Rut's "little girl" comment is sexist. Other guy uses lots of inappropriate apostrophes. I'm not as fast as I was when I started working college (see what I did there?). We're all flawed.

Motion to drop this and move on.