Good no call? Yay or nay?

[JugglingReferee]

In order, I like these calls:

1. PC foul
2. travelling
3. no call with the OB direction as the L shows

Everything other than that is a wrong call.

[Multiple Sports]

Agree with BNR (I think that may be twice this year)... I have no issues with a PC, but am leaning towards a NC

[Toren]

Player control

Why is my slot trying to officiate from the T? He would have had a nice angle if he would have hustled down. Instead he took it easy and put it all on the L. The L passed on it, and the C couldn't come in late because it's so far away. Might as well bought a ticket and sat with the other spectators.

[HawkeyeCubP]

Originally Posted by JetMetFan

Big fat nay. L should be keying in those two defenders, and C looks lazy and can't help.

[JugglingReferee]

Originally Posted by JugglingReferee

In order, I like these calls:

1. PC foul
2. travelling

Everything other than that is a wrong call.

I was able to pause the video to see the airborne pivot foot returning to the floor after contact, with ball still in hand. If you're not going with a foul, then giving the ball back to A misses two infractions by A, so I no longer support option 3.

L missed the PC foul, and T missed the travel.

[amusedofficial]

Originally Posted by BadNewsRef

Show me a cite that says knocking someone down with the ball is a foul.

4-19. A personal foul is a player foul which involves illegal contact with an opponent while the ball is live, which hinders an opponent ...

6-1 a player shall not "use rough tactics"

Don't see anything that says the contact or rough tactics must be body to body. If clearing a path by using the ball as a battering ram was legal contact, I think more than a few coaches would be using it every trip.

[APG]

Originally Posted by amusedofficial

4-19. A personal foul is a player foul which involves illegal contact with an opponent while the ball is live, which hinders an opponent ...

6-1 a player shall not "use rough tactics"

Don't see anything that says the contact or rough tactics must be body to body. If clearing a path by using the ball as a battering ram was legal contact, I think more than a few coaches would be using it every trip.

If you want to get real technical, the rule says illegal contact with an opponent...hitting someone with the ball is not contacting an opponent. So technically, your only option is to call a technical foul...

Not saying that's how I'd call or nor what I think should be called on this play.

[JetMetFan]

Originally Posted by Toren

Why is my slot trying to officiate from the T? He would have had a nice angle if he would have hustled down. Instead he took it easy and put it all on the L.

Just your textbook double trail setup.

Maybe the C blanked for a moment and forgot this was a three-person setup? I don't know if IAABO Bd. 12 does a lot of three-person and it's not an excuse but the nice guy in me is trying to come up with a reason - other than a sheer lack of hustle - why the C would've stopped 28 feet from the endline.