![]() |
|
|||
Florida v. Louisville
__________________
Chaos isn't a pit. Chaos is a ladder. Many who try to climb it fail and never get to try again. The fall breaks them. And some, given a chance to climb, they refuse. They cling to the realm, or the gods, or love. Illusions. Only the ladder is real. The climb is all there is. |
|
|||
No B/C definitely. Couldn't tell watching the game live and didn't have it on DVR.
I'm still iffy on the block but I give Hess the benefit of doubt. But watching the replay, just noticed it was a split second away from a 10-second count. (thanks apg)
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR |
|
|||
If I were the opposing coach, I'd ask how close it was to a 10-second violation. (As he wasn't counting during the time of this clip.)
__________________
I can't remember the last time I wasn't at least kind-of tired. Last edited by HawkeyeCubP; Mon Mar 26, 2012 at 12:08am. |
|
|||
The block is the "safe" call. I thought either of the two first ones were closer to a block then the one he actually calls.
No B/C. I wasn't sure if the referee was signaling that it was tapped or that he was dribbling, therefore 2 feet and the ball needed to cross. Either way I didn't like the signal he was using to communicate. |
|
|||
That is a perfect example of the 3-point rule for a dribbler crossing the division line....legal.
__________________
Owner/Developer of RefTown.com Commissioner, Portland Basketball Officials Association |
|
|||
I'm going to have to give you the chance to explain exactly what you mean by that because it seems as if you are saying that the right call was a PC, but that the official lacked the courage to make it.
So please tell me what a "safe call" is. |
|
|||
i'm curious too!
|
|
|||
Ssssaaaaffffeeeee!!!!!
That's the call that I make when the batter/runner touches first base bag before the ball is caught by the first baseman.
OOPS!! Wrong forum - me bad!! ![]() ![]()
__________________
![]() ![]() |
|
|||
Agreed. A good video for training purposes, too.
__________________
Pope Francis |
|
|||
Quote:
![]() I'm sure we've all had a similar play where we pass on the first one, pass on the second one (thinking, that's marginal, but it's getting closer and closer to illegal) than the third one comes and bam we hit the defender with the foul. In this case, I felt the defender was legal on the third one, but I feel he was penalized as a culmination of the previous ones. But when I look at the play that was penalized, the defender is legal and the offense extends a forearm. So either it's a No Call or it's Player Control, we can't penalize the defense on that play alone. That's what I meant by "safe call" I don't know about his particular courage, but I'm pretty sure you don't make it to that level of being a referee without courage. |
|
|||
Quote:
![]()
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR |
|
|||
Quote:
Then the contact by the defender that he initially deemed marginal became illegal. I can see his focus being on the potential b/c play... twice, as opposed to the contact by the defender. Our eyes only see what our mind tells us we are looking at.
__________________
I gotta new attitude! |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
In a perfect world we want to get RSBQ perimiter plays immediately. But when your mind tells your eyes to watch the division line, twice in one transition (uncommon) I can see him not getting it then asking himself "did the defender do something a fraction of a second earlier to make the offense push off?"
__________________
I gotta new attitude! |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Davidson v. Louisville | APG | Basketball | 9 | Fri Mar 16, 2012 11:28am |
Louisville, Ky | Bart Tyson | Feedback | 0 | Mon Feb 22, 2010 06:19pm |
WVA vs. Louisville | refguy | Basketball | 22 | Tue Feb 02, 2010 02:16pm |
Louisville/WVU | rainmaker | Basketball | 11 | Sun Mar 27, 2005 06:01am |
Cinn-Louisville.... | DrakeM | Basketball | 11 | Fri Feb 07, 2003 11:11am |