Foul after shot

[packersowner]

Situation 3 - shooter was FT line extended, contact happened on the 3 point line. It was one of those situations where team B came to close out and ended up bumping A1 because they were late.

Situation 4 - A2 was going to rebound and dislodged B1, some might say he was giving him the business (parents in the crowd were yelling "over the back" "over the back") I think we have all been there for this call.

[Adam]

Originally Posted by packersowner

Situation 3 - shooter was FT line extended, contact happened on the 3 point line. It was one of those situations where team B came to close out and ended up bumping A1 because they were late.

Then the throw in should have been on the side line. Not a huge mistake, though; the biggest thing is to count the bucket and give the ball to the right team.

[M&M Guy]

Question about #2 - how much contact was there? Was it the same contact as in #1?

Everyone understands that contact on the arm as the shot is being released is likely a disadvantage to the shooter, and is most likely a foul. But that same contact after the shot is released doesn't affect the shot at all, so it is more likely incidental, especially if the shooter is able to land normally.

If your question implies more than enough contact to warrant a foul, and you're simply asking about penalty enforcement, then "never mind". I just wanted to point out there are still a number of officials that call the same contact on the arm as a foul whether the shot is already gone or not.

[Loudwhistle2]

Originally Posted by M&M Guy

Question about #2 - how much contact was there? Was it the same contact as in #1?

Everyone understands that contact on the arm as the shot is being released is likely a disadvantage to the shooter, and is most likely a foul. But that same contact after the shot is released doesn't affect the shot at all, so it is more likely incidental, especially if the shooter is able to land normally.

If your question implies more than enough contact to warrant a foul, and you're simply asking about penalty enforcement, then "never mind". I just wanted to point out there are still a number of officials that call the same contact on the arm as a foul whether the shot is already gone or not.

I agree and I have to explain this to at least two coaches a year. "but he got hit on the arm!" "it was after the shot and considered incidental contact"

[Adam]

Originally Posted by M&M Guy

Question about #2 - how much contact was there? Was it the same contact as in #1?

Everyone understands that contact on the arm as the shot is being released is likely a disadvantage to the shooter, and is most likely a foul. But that same contact after the shot is released doesn't affect the shot at all, so it is more likely incidental, especially if the shooter is able to land normally.

If your question implies more than enough contact to warrant a foul, and you're simply asking about penalty enforcement, then "never mind". I just wanted to point out there are still a number of officials that call the same contact on the arm as a foul whether the shot is already gone or not.

Had a T a few years ago when a coach didn't like my no-call on just this scenario. Shot is gone, defender comes in late making contact with the wrist. Shooter some how gets knocked down by the wrist contact. I'm T, right in front of the coach. He starts screaming.

He stopped screaming when I blew my whistle.

[M&M Guy]

Originally Posted by Snaqwells

He stopped screaming when I blew my whistle.

See, it made the game better.

[Adam]

Originally Posted by M&M Guy

See, it made the game better.

Welcome back.

Now shut up.