Flagrant 1 Technical Foul

[dahoopref]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

Actually it is a "Contact dead ball foul" (4-29-3g) which is specific to this kind of play if the ball was ruled dead. That is of course if we want to play the semantics games.

Peace

The "semantics" are important as to which foul to access.

A Contact Dead Ball Technical counts toward an ejection if the player picks up another Class A Tech or 2 Class B Techs.

A Flagrant 1 PF counts only toward the players allotted 5 PFs.

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by dahoopref

The "semantics" are important as to which foul to access.

A Contact Dead Ball Technical counts toward an ejection if the player picks up another Class A Tech or 2 Class B Techs.

A Flagrant 1 PF counts only toward the players allotted 5 PFs.

Yes but the action we are discussing is a Flagrant 1 equivalent the only difference it is a dead ball foul. Because it is not supposed to get called a Flagrant 1 Technical, the language as to if a foul is called is very similar. And in the rule they say, "but does not rise to the level of a Flagrant 2." Any dead ball foul in NF rules is still a Technical, no matter what you want to call it.

Peace

[Camron Rust]

Originally Posted by dahoopref

The "semantics" are important as to which foul to access.

A Contact Dead Ball Technical counts toward an ejection if the player picks up another Class A Tech or 2 Class B Techs.

A Flagrant 1 PF counts only toward the players allotted 5 PFs.

What if the fouls are inaccessible?