Delay of Game Situation / Ruling

[APG]

Originally Posted by jkumpire

I'd consider an ejection for USC on the part of the HC in this case as well. This is very close to flagrant behavior to me.



I'm sure that's a minority of one opinion, but I think if this happened as the poster said it did, how can you not at least think about it?

Ejection? Really?!

[fortmoney]

What could be gained by doing this on purpose???

[APG]

Originally Posted by fortmoney

What could be gained by doing this on purpose???

Stop the clock from running after a made basket.

[Camron Rust]

Originally Posted by AllPurposeGamer

Ejection? Really?!

And on the HC???? I've got nothing on the HC, not even basic T.

[Welpe]

Originally Posted by Camron Rust

And on the HC???? I've got nothing on the HC, not even basic T.

I agree. Assess the technical against the offending player and move on.

[jkumpire]

Originally Posted by AllPurposeGamer

Ejection? Really?!

Here's why:

1. I thought the kid threw the ball 12-14 rows up into the stands like so many others.
2. If the Assistant Coach is telling you this before the play there is intent involved, and it's not the AC who is saying throw the ball into the stands to get a DOG, it's the HC.
3. In my judgment the act of throwing a ball that deep in the stands is a serious case of USC. If the kid in a fit of anger launches the ball that far into the stands are you just going ignore it? You can get a DOG or even DOG T in a much better and more sporting manner (if you can somehow use that term to talk about it. I can't).
4. Add 2+3 together, and I still think you have to think about it, if not a flagrant T on the HC, maybe a flagrant T on the player.

I probably wouldn't do it, but I would consider it